California objects to 23andMe sale to former CEO, says it would skirt state privacy law
By Ron Leuty,
San Francisco Business Times
| 06. 16. 2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will review the deal.
In an objection filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in St. Louis, Bonta's team said the proposed structure of 23andMe's sale to a nonprofit formed by Wojcicki skirts a 2021 state law that would require consumers give their "separate and express" consent before their genetic data and biological samples are transferred or disclosed.
More than 20 states have opposed the sale process due to concerns that consumers' genetic information and other private data would be exposed to uses they didn't agree to when signing up for 23andMe's service. In 23andMe's home state of California, the Genetic Information Privacy Act of 2021 should empower consumers to give proactive approval to transfer their data, the filing states.
23andMe doesn't dispute that the law applies, according to the filing, but fears that compliance would be "too costly" because many Californians would...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
