Base editing marches on the clinic
By Michael Eisenstein,
Nature
| 05. 09. 2022
This year could see the first trials of therapies employing base editing that introduce precise single-nucleotide changes into patient genomes.
Two companies, Beam Therapeutics and Verve Therapeutics, are leading the charge of base editing therapies to the clinic. Last November, Beam got the green light from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its upcoming BEACON-101 trial that will use base editing to restore expression of fetal globin in bone marrow stem cells. In parallel, Verve is preparing to embark on an in vivo base editing trial to treat patients who have experienced a heart attack and have abnormally high cholesterol levels by targeting the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) gene, after obtaining promising results from preclinical work in rodents and non-human primates. “We’re optimistic about dosing our first patients in the second half of this year,” says Verve CEO and co-founder Sekar Kathiresan. The rapid progress of base editing programs is attracting interest from major pharmaceutical companies: in January, Beam entered a collaboration with Pfizer that could net the company up to $1.3 billion.
Beam’s rapid progress to the clinic — using technology developed just six years ago — has been built on the shoulders...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...