Assisted Reproductive Technologies in an Inquiry-based Classroom
By Gina Maranto, Biopolitical Times guest contributor,
Biopolitical Times
| 07. 02. 2011
Since the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, the mainstream English-language press around the world has valorized IVF doctors and alternately sentimentalized and exaggerated the possibilities afforded by assisted reproduction. Countering such views in the classroom can be difficult, especially because students must grasp the details of reproductive technologies before they can begin to assess the veracity of claims made for them and to examine their ramifications.
For the last several years, I‘ve taught a course titled “Rent-a-Wombs and Donor Eggs” for the Women’s and Gender Studies program at the University of Miami using an inquiry-based pedagogical approach, which has proved especially fruitful in dealing with a topical subject like ARTs. The inquiry approach is effectively the opposite of the stand-and-deliver format that Brazilian educational theorist Paulo Freire termed the “banking model” of education. Instead of “depositing” information that is subsequently “withdrawn” in the form of tests and papers, inquiry facilitates learning by allowing students to explore open-ended questions--with the aid, in my case, of methods like rhetorical and visual analysis, interviews, surveys, and Web 2.0 applications.
Of course, because...
Related Articles
By George Janes, BioNews | 01.12.2026
A heart attack patient has become the first person to be treated in a clinical trial of an experimental gene therapy, which aims to strengthen blood vessels after coronary bypass surgery.
Coronary artery bypass surgery is performed to treat...
By Staff, ScienceDaily | 01.05.2026
Scientists at UNSW Sydney have developed a new form of CRISPR technology that could make gene therapy safer while also resolving a decades-long debate about how genes are switched off. The research shows that small chemical markers attached to DNA
...
Following a long-standing CGS tradition, we present a selection of our favorite Biopolitical Times posts of the past year.
In 2025, we published up to four posts every month, written by 12 authors (staff, consultants and allies), some in collaboration and one simply credited to CGS.
These titles are presented in chronological order, except for three In Memoriam notices, which follow. Many more posts that are worth your time can be found in the archive. Scroll down and “VIEW...
By Jonathan Matthews, GMWatch | 12.11.2025
In our first article in this series, we investigated the dark PR tactics that have accompanied Colossal Bioscience’s de-extinction disinformation campaign, in which transgenic cloned grey wolves have been showcased to the world as resurrected dire wolves – a...