Assisted Reproductive Technologies in an Inquiry-based Classroom
By Gina Maranto, Biopolitical Times guest contributor,
Biopolitical Times
| 07. 02. 2011
Since the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, the mainstream English-language press around the world has valorized IVF doctors and alternately sentimentalized and exaggerated the possibilities afforded by assisted reproduction. Countering such views in the classroom can be difficult, especially because students must grasp the details of reproductive technologies before they can begin to assess the veracity of claims made for them and to examine their ramifications.
For the last several years, I‘ve taught a course titled “Rent-a-Wombs and Donor Eggs” for the Women’s and Gender Studies program at the University of Miami using an inquiry-based pedagogical approach, which has proved especially fruitful in dealing with a topical subject like ARTs. The inquiry approach is effectively the opposite of the stand-and-deliver format that Brazilian educational theorist Paulo Freire termed the “banking model” of education. Instead of “depositing” information that is subsequently “withdrawn” in the form of tests and papers, inquiry facilitates learning by allowing students to explore open-ended questions--with the aid, in my case, of methods like rhetorical and visual analysis, interviews, surveys, and Web 2.0 applications.
Of course, because...
Related Articles
GeneWatch UK has prepared a briefing on the genetic modification of nature for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Congress in October 2025
The upcoming Congress claims to be “where the world comes together to set priorities and drive conservation and sustainable development action.” A major concern for those on the outside is that the Congress may advance plans to develop and encourage the use of synthetic biology in nature conservation. This could at first glance sound like...
By Aaron Ginn, The Washington Post | 09.12.2025
Earlier this year, I had dinner in D.C. with Jensen Huang, the president and chief executive of Nvidia. At one point, he said something that struck me: “Why is everyone here so negative?”
He wasn’t referring to the economy...
By Roni Caryn Rabin, The New York Times | 08.25.2025
Scientists have dreamed for centuries about using animal organs to treat ailing humans. In recent years, those efforts have begun to bear fruit: Researchers have begun transplanting the hearts and kidneys of genetically modified pigs into patients, with varying degrees...
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...