Ageing and Fertility: Biology Comes Second
By Kirsty Oswald,
BioNews
| 08. 10. 2015
The association between a woman's age and her fertility never seems far from the news but recently there has been a veritable bombardment of opinion over what age a woman should have a child.
We are repeatedly reminded that a woman's fertility drops off a cliff after age 40. Or was it 35? Or 38? I don't remember. And it depends which week you ask.
How does this keep making headlines time and time again, when each finding seems so unauthoritative and inconsistent it might as well have been picked from a hat?
It would appear we cannot resist a biologically authorised opportunity to tell a woman what to do with her body. But all this talk of the age a woman's fertility 'drops off a cliff' is just a distractor from the truth – this phenomenon of women finding themselves 'up against' the biological clock is a cultural one, not a biological one.
Read more...
Image via Wikimedia Commons.
Related Articles
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.30.2026
A research program at the National Institutes of Health released the world’s largest database of human genomes and paired them with clinical data, officials announced Tuesday, paving the way for a new era of study in personalized medicine.
The All...
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Birthrates in much of the developed world are at record lows, but there’s one demographic group that’s exploring new frontiers of fertility: ultrawealthy men. Deploying nearly limitless resources, a small number of them are reproducing at such an extraordinary scale...
By Carl Zimmer and Catrin Einhorn, The New York Times | 06.25.2026
The Trump administration and a company that is promising to bring long-gone animals back from extinction announced a partnership on Thursday to preserve cells, tissue and DNA from threatened and endangered species.
The company, Colossal Biosciences, said its goal was...
By Anna Rogers, Mother Jones | 06.19.2026