2003 CGS Report on the UN Cloning Treaty Negotiations
By admin
| 11. 24. 2003
Human Cloning, the United Nations, and Beyond
On November 6, 2003, after two years of debate and no substantive
action, the United Nations voted to suspend until late 2005
any further consideration of a French-German proposal for an
international treaty to ban human cloning.
The vote in the Legal (Sixth) Committee of the UN General Assembly
was very close: 80 countries voted for the suspension, 79 wished
to continue negotiations, 15 formally abstained, and 17 were
not present.
What happened, and why? What are the implications for global
governance of the new human genetic technologies? What is likely
to happen next, and what can be done?
The Original Proposal
France and Germany initiated the cloning treaty process in
September 2001. They limited their proposed ban to reproductive
cloning because they recognized that a broader proposal - in
particular, one that also banned research cloning - would not
be able to attain the effective consensus required to successfully
conclude a treaty within the UN structure. They believed that
a treaty banning reproductive cloning would be a critically
important contribution in itself, and would establish a precedent
and structure...
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...
