The Dilemma of Whether to Release Genetic Information
By Xavier Symons,
BioEdge
| 03. 01. 2014
New studies are suggesting that doctors need to be more cautious when they release genetic information to patients.
A recent article in the American Journal of Psychiatry has examined the effects of informing patients of genetic predispositions to disease on their subsequent cognitive performance. The authors of the article, from the University of Indiana and UC San Diego, found that respondents who were informed of a disposition to Alzheimer’s performed worse on memory tests and had reduced confidence in the current power of their memory.
In the study, which involved almost 150 participants, some of the patients were given the results of genetic test for Alzheimer’s predisposition, whilst others were tested but not told of their results.
The researchers found that those participants who were informed of their predisposition to Alzheimer’s performed far worse on the tests for objective and subjective memory. The ”informed” participants showed poorer comprehension when asked to recount narratives and recall images. In subjective memory tests they were far more pessimistic about the strength of their current memory.
In addition avoiding the negative psychological effects of...
Related Articles
By Joel Kotkin, UnHerd | 07.01.2025
Visionaries, dreamers, and autocrats have long dreamt of reshaping humanity to their preferred model. In the last century, eugenics was enthusiastically embraced among Anglo-Saxon elites, then by Communist Russia as a means of creating a hyper-selfless Homo Sovieticus...
By Al Letson, Reveal | 06.28.2025
Photo "Elon Musk Presenting Tesla's Fully Autonomous Future" by Steve Jurvetson on Flickr (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)
What do Silicon Valley billionaires, religious parents of six, and eugenics-curious biotech founders have in common? Welcome to the world of pronatalism—a growing...
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...