An Embryonic Disaster?
By Isabel Oakeshott and Sarah-Kate Templeton,
The Sunday Times
| 03. 16. 2008
The government’s new fertility bill is under fire on religious, moral and even scientific grounds
When Liz Shipley was diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND) it came as
little surprise. The 36-year-old from Newcastle had lost her mother to the
same condition when she was just three years old. Several other members of
her family, including her sister and uncle, had died or were suffering from
the muscle-wasting disease.
Ten years on and unable to walk, write or dress herself, she fears that her
two teenage children will also inherit the disease. Shipley does not expect
a cure in her lifetime but she backs controversial scientific research using
embryos that are part-human, part-animal, which could lead to a treatment
for her children if they are struck down.
“When you have an illness for which there is no cure, you have to investigate
every avenue,” said Shipley. “I do not want my children to be told in 20
years’ time that they have MND and there is still no cure. I believe the
answers will lie in stem cells of some kind. Hopefully this research will be
able to tell us why this is happening to...
Related Articles
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...
By Elise Kinsella, ABC News | 06.15.2025
When *Sarah and her partner needed fertility testing, it was Monash IVF that the pair turned to.
"Having a quick browse online, Monash IVF was one of the most prominent ones that came up on Google search and after contacting...
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 06.13.2025
IVF is “big business” and experts are concerned about conflicts of interest between profit-making and helping families have children.
Monash IVF’s second embryo bungle has sparked renewed scrutiny on the IVF industry as a whole amid calls for national regulation...