Fertility Therapies Under the Microscope
By Shirley S. Wang,
Wall Street Journal
| 11. 15. 2007
As Couples Rush to Embrace Genetic Screening, Egg Freezing, Other High-Tech Treatments, Debate Grows Over Their Value
As medical science continues to churn out ever-more-sophisticated methods to treat infertility -- from egg freezing to genetic screening of embryos -- desperate would-be parents rush to embrace the latest techniques. But some fertility experts worry that procedures of limited benefit are unfairly raising patients' hopes.
Just last month, a new embryo-screening technique created immediate buzz when it was announced at a meeting of fertility experts. A parent group hailed it as a "breakthrough" that may improve women's chances of having a baby through in-vitro fertilization. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine, which hosted the meeting, awarded the technique a prize for outstanding research.
But that same day, a related group of experts issued a warning. A committee of the ASRM, together with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, released a statement urging caution about certain kinds of genetic embryo screening, due to insufficient scientific evidence about the usefulness. A similar concern was noted about egg freezing -- or oocyte cryopreservation -- for healthy woman who want to preserve their eggs for use later in life. The statement called the...
Related Articles
By Courtney Withers and Daryna Zadvirna, ABC News | 12.03.2025
Same-sex couples, single people, transgender and intersex West Australians will be able to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and surrogacy, almost a decade after reforms were first promised.
The landmark legislation, which removes the requirement for people to demonstrate medical...
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...