The Right to Genetic Ignorance
By Editorial,
New Scientist
| 09. 06. 2013
The age of genomic medicine is dawning. Whole-genome sequencing is starting to transform the diagnosis of rare inherited diseases, and within a few decades it could be a routine part of medical care (see "
Your genomic future: Personalised medicine is here ").
But an ethical row has broken out on this new frontier. In June, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics published guidelines arguing that people having their genome sequenced should be informed if the results show defects in any of 56 genes linked to 24 serious diseases (
Genetics in Medicine, vol 15, p 565).
The idea is to flag up known risks that could be mitigated – although in some cases that could require drastic action. The list includes mutations in the
BRCA1 gene that earlier this year prompted movie star
Angelina Jolie to have a double mastectomy to reduce her risk of developing breast cancer.
The intentions are laudable, but routine disclosure may not always be welcome. Imagine that you are seeking the cause of a mysterious condition that has brought your...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...