“Ridding the Race of His Defective Blood”—Eugenics in the Journal, 1906–1948
By Paul A. Lombardo,
The New England Journal of Medicine
| 03. 02. 2024
In 1923, Boston City Hospital chose Dr. William Mayo, already famous for the work of his Minnesota clinic, to speak at the inauguration of a new laboratory. Mayo’s thoughts on hospital administration, published in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal (which would be renamed the New England Journal of Medicine in 1928), highlighted the common anxieties of his profession and went far beyond the anodyne comments that were usual on such occasions.1 Mayo amplified the phobias and fed the moral panic stemming from the eugenic thought of that time, saying that municipal hospitals were swamped by the poor, as cities were besieged by criminals and the country threatened with demise by waves of defective immigrants. While Congress debated increased restriction on immigration, Mayo traced poverty to “constitutional inferiority and mental instability,” declaring both “to a large extent hereditary.”
Mayo said one goal of public hospitals should be to “reduce the number of people whom it must care for at the expense of the taxpayer.” A robust sterilization program and limits on immigration of the “defective” would serve that goal...
Related Articles
By Julia Métraux, Mother Jones [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 07.07.2026
During his 2015 State of the Union address, then-President Barack Obama announced what he promised would be an ambitious public health project. “Tonight, I’m launching a new Precision Medicine Initiative to bring us closer to curing diseases like cancer and diabetes...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Birthrates in much of the developed world are at record lows, but there’s one demographic group that’s exploring new frontiers of fertility: ultrawealthy men. Deploying nearly limitless resources, a small number of them are reproducing at such an extraordinary scale...
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.11.2026
When scientists at Columbia University announced they had used a newer technology to precisely edit the genes of human embryos last week, they set the academic community ablaze with debate. Is this good news or bad? How fast will...