Protecting Genetic Data - A Primer for Employers
By Jeremy Gruber,
Council for Responsible Genetics Blog
| 07. 02. 2014
Untitled Document
As genetic testing and genetic information become increasingly available, it is critical that employers have a full understanding of current genetic privacy and nondiscrimination protections, to ensure their workplaces are in full compliance with federal and state laws. For example, the U.S. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) took effect on November 21, 2009, yet many employers still are unfamiliar with its provisions. Many are even less familiar with applicable state genetic privacy laws, despite enhanced enforcement of both federal and state laws.
Federal law:
GINA and employment
Prohibitions
One section of GINA, called Title II, applies equally to employers, employment agencies, labor organizations, and joint labor-management committees that control job training. This section of the law makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to “fail or refuse to hire ... discharge ... or otherwise to discriminate against any employee with respect to the compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” because of an employee’s genetic information. Generally, a person’s genetic information is defined as information obtained from the individual’s genetic tests, those of the individual’s family...
Related Articles
A Review of Exposed by Becky McClain
“Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble.”
— John Lewis
Becky McClain became famous when she successfully sued Pfizer, one of the very largest pharmaceutical and biotech companies. She...
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 12.10.2025
Micah Nerio had known since his early 30s that he wanted to be a father, even if he did not have a partner. He spent a decade saving up to pursue surrogacy, an expensive process where he would create embryos...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 12.08.2025
A huge defense policy bill, revealed by US lawmakers on Sunday, does not include a provision that would have provided broad healthcare coverage for in vitro fertilization (IVF) for active-duty members of the military, despite Donald Trump’s pledge...
