Letter to the New York stem cell research program ethics board
By Jesse Reynolds and Susan Fogel
| 01. 21. 2009
Dear Members of the NYSTEM Ethics Board:
We are supporters of embryonic stem cell research who wish to express our deep concerns about your upcoming consideration of permitting payments to women to provide eggs for stem cell research. Multiple egg extraction poses risks to women's health without a clear and demonstrable scientific rationale, and allowing payments for eggs is contrary to the guidelines set by the National Academies of Science.
The extraction of eggs poses nontrivial health risks for the women. The drug most often used to shut down the ovaries, Lupron, can cause side effects, including severe joint pain, difficulty breathing, chest pain, depression, amnesia, hypertension, and asthma. The drugs used to hyperstimulate the ovaries can lead to Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome, which in the most severe cases can lead to hospitalization and, rarely, death. The Institute of Medicine report, Assessing the Medical Risks of Human Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research, makes clear how little is known about the full risks of multiple egg extraction. In fact, the limited research has been done on infertile women, and therefore virtually...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...