Genetic testing evolves, along with health and ethics debates
By Michael Hiltzik,
Los Angeles Times
| 10. 30. 2015
Untitled Document
When last we visited with the genetic testing firm 23andMe, it was in big trouble.
That was in December 2013. The Food and Drug Administration had just ruled that the company had been breaking the law in marketing its Personal Genome Service. For $99, customers spit into a tube, mailed it to 23andMe and got back a report on their carrier status or susceptibility to breast cancer, heart disease and some 250 other diseases or conditions, based on genetic information extracted from their saliva.
The FDA described the service as an unlicensed medical device and ordered it off the market. Its warning letter implied that the Mountain View, Calif., company hadn't been straight with regulators and was ignoring demands for data proving its service was accurate. Experts in the genetics testing field wondered whether the tests — and the company itself — were ready for prime time.
As of mid-October, 23andMe is back in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing business. (The firm's name refers to the 23 chromosome pairs in the human genome.) It's selling a different product, one...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...