A genetic “Minority Report”: How corporate DNA testing could put us at risk
By Benjamin Winterhalter,
Salon
| 01. 26. 2014
On Nov. 22, 2013, the FDA sent a now-infamous letter to the genetic
research startup 23andMe, ordering the company to stop marketing some of
its personal DNA testing kits. In its letter, the agency told 23andMe
that it was concerned about the possibility of erroneous test results,
about false positives and false negatives. The FDA warned that false
positives – for example, being told that one has a high risk of breast
cancer when really one doesn’t – might lead customers to seek expensive
testing or medical treatment that they don’t really need. False
negatives – which are just the opposite – might lead customers to ignore
serious health problems or deviate from a prescribed treatment regime.
The company had been out of contact with the FDA since May of 2013, and
had not filed the required information to allay the bureau’s concerns.
When
word about the letter got out, the ever-ready machine of Internet
journalism whirred quickly to life. Defenders of the genetic research
firm argued that the information, if used properly and with a
physician’s supervision, is not only...
Related Articles
By Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times | 08.13.2026
Immigrants at Ellis Island undergoing a medical inspection | Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
In 1924, Congress sent a message to the world: We are no longer ready to take “your tired, your poor, your huddled...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...