Forensics Specialist Discusses a Discipline in Crisis
By Daniel Cressey,
Nature News
| 02. 12. 2015
Untitled Document
Solid scientific evidence can be crucial for solving crimes. But science may have been progressing too fast for the courts and the juries to keep up. The problem was symbolized by a ruling last year in which Mark Dwyer, a judge of the New York State Supreme Court, declared that a forensic-analysis technique known as low-copy-number DNA testing was inadmissible because there was no consensus in the scientific community that it was valid forensic tool. The technique, which consists of amplifying very small amounts of DNA to obtain a profile, has been used to get convictions in various countries but has been criticized as being susceptible to contamination and having problems with reproducibility.
To help to bridge the divide between law and lab, leading forensic scientists held a meeting with senior legal experts in London earlier this month.
Nature spoke to Niamh Nic Daéid of the University of Dundee, UK, who co-organized the meeting with fellow Dundee forensics expert Sue Black. One of Britain's leading forensic scientists, Nic Daéid works at Dundee's Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification...
Related Articles
By Holly Baxter, The Independent | 08.19.2025
In rural Pennsylvania, I’m hiking through the forest with Simone and Malcom Collins and discussing the executive order they wrote for Donald Trump. Just outside their house — beyond the chicken coop, where they gather their eggs for homemade cakes...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Dennis Sponer, BioSpace | 09.03.2025
Imagine telling a child with sickle cell disease that a cure exists—but it’s too expensive for their insurer to cover. That’s not a hypothetical. It’s the reality of gene therapy today: a revolutionary medical breakthrough caught in the bottleneck of...
By Tia Ghose, Live Science | 09.16.2025
Twenty-six years ago today, on Sept. 17, a teenager who had received an experimental gene therapy died. His death led to needed changes in the clinical trial process while also spurring skepticism that would ultimately stall the field of gene...