The FDA’s 23andMe decision will also change the rules for all at-home medical genetic testing
By Dave Gershgorn,
Quartz
| 04. 10. 2017
Doctors are losing their role as the gatekeeper of our health information, for better or worse.
Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration made a surprise announcement giving genetic testing company 23andMe clearance to sell a service that gives customers a risk analysis for 10 genetically linked diseases. It reverses a 2013 decision that cited concerns that inaccurate testing results—and potential customer misinterpretation—made for a public health threat, and builds on a 2015 agreement between the FDA and 23andMe that allowed the company to offer a test that told customers of their “carrier status” of genetic markers for certain diseases—but not assess their actual risk. This latest decision means 23andMe will again be able to provide specific risk analyses to customers, and perhaps more importantly, throws the door wide open to dozens of other companies to run out their own versions of at-home genetic risk-analysis products.
The disease risk that 23andMe offers isn’t a diagnosis; it just gives you your potential for elevated risk. For example, if a person inherited a copy of the ApoE4 gene variant from both...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...