Charles Halpern Letter to the Attorney General
By Charles Halpern
| 12. 14. 2004
Dear Mr. Attorney General:
I am writing to request you to take action pursuant to your duties under the Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act, Sec. 11130(a). I request you to take such steps as are necessary to prevent a meeting in violation of the Act-- the meeting of the Citizen's Independent Oversight Committee scheduled for December 17. In addition, I request you to determine if an attempt was made to build a consensus in advance of the meeting on issues that were properly the public's business and therefore should have been deliberated at the meeting, with full public participation.
As you know the voters of California passed a historic amendment to the California Constitution less than six weeks ago. Proposition 59, now enshrined in the Constitution, reaffirms the right of the people to participate actively about the conduct of the people's business; in particular, it states that the "meetings of public bodies… shall be open to public scrutiny" and that a statute implementing that policy "shall be broadly construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly construed if...
Related Articles
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By David Jensen, The California Stem Cell Report | 12.11.2025
California’s stem cell and gene therapy agency today approved spending $207 million more on training and education, sidestepping the possibility of using the cash to directly support revolutionary research that has been slashed and endangered by the Trump administration.
Directors...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 12.10.2025
Micah Nerio had known since his early 30s that he wanted to be a father, even if he did not have a partner. He spent a decade saving up to pursue surrogacy, an expensive process where he would create embryos...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
