Testimony of Charles Halpern, Public Interest Attorney and Member, Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences
By Charles Halpern,
Testimony to California Senate Subcommittee
| 03. 09. 2005
Oversight Hearing on the Implementation of Proposition 71, the Stem Cell Research and Cures Act
Joint Hearing of the California Senate Subcommittee on Stem Cell Research Oversight, Senate Health Committee, and Assembly Health Committee
Testimony of Charles Halpern, Public Interest
Attorney and Member, Institute of Medicine of the National Academy
of Sciences
Oversight Hearing on the Implementation of Proposition 71,
the Stem Cell Research and Cures Act
Joint Hearing of the California Senate Subcommittee on Stem
Cell Research Oversight, Senate Health Committee, and Assembly
Health Committee
March 9, 2005
SUMMARY
This Oversight Hearing is an important milestone in the California
effort to assume leadership in the field of stem cell research.
Active legislative engagement with the California Institute
for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) is essential for this initiative
to succeed.
The Independent Citizen’s Oversight Committee (ICOC) has
met four times since the passage of Proposition 71. While the
ICOC has made some important decisions, it still must lay a
solid foundation for its grants program. Grant guidelines and
an operating budget must be developed. The conflict of interest
problem, which affects all aspects of the ICOC process, must
be addressed in a serious fashion.
I encourage the Senate Oversight Subcommittee to take the following
steps:
Establish a regular schedule of oversight hearings, every two
or...
Related Articles
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Mullin, Wired | 10.30.2025
In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jiankui shocked the world when he revealed that he had created the first gene-edited babies. Using Crispr, he tweaked the genes of three human embryos in an attempt to make them immune to HIV and...
By B.A. Parker & Gene Demby, NPR | 10.29.2025
What do conservatives like JD Vance and tech executives like Elon Musk have in common? They, like other pronatalists, want to “save civilization” by having more American babies. But it wasn’t that long ago that some people wanted to save...
By Jallicia A. Jolly, Sydney Curtis and Nicole Sessions, Ms. Magazine | 10.17.2025
Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk of “moral decay” and see low birth rates as a threat to the future of humanity. In the mainstream media...
