[North Carolina] Panel passes embryonic stem cell research
By Gary D. Robertson,
Associated Press
| 07. 26. 2007
RALEIGH (AP) - The largest committee in the state House backed legislation Thursday setting rules for how research can be performed on human embryonic stem cells, even though the bill eliminated funding to encourage research.
The bill's primary sponsor is Rep. Earl Jones, D-Guilford.
The guidelines, approved by a 45-35 vote, would permit research on stem cells left over from in-vitro fertilization that would otherwise be discarded. But a $10 million appropriation was removed from the bill that would have helped the state Health and Wellness Trust Fund distribute grants to nonprofit groups conducting stem cell research.
The money was eliminated because it could take about a year for the trust fund to set up guidelines, Jones said. He said embryonic stem cells could offer a renewable source of replacement cells and tissues to treat Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, spinal cord injuries and other conditions.
"People are dying from these diseases," said Rep. Larry Womble, D-Forsyth, who supports the bill. "If we can address that to save a whole lot of lives that we cannot save now ... this is...
Related Articles
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Mullin, Wired | 10.30.2025
In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jiankui shocked the world when he revealed that he had created the first gene-edited babies. Using Crispr, he tweaked the genes of three human embryos in an attempt to make them immune to HIV and...
By B.A. Parker & Gene Demby, NPR | 10.29.2025
What do conservatives like JD Vance and tech executives like Elon Musk have in common? They, like other pronatalists, want to “save civilization” by having more American babies. But it wasn’t that long ago that some people wanted to save...
By Jallicia A. Jolly, Sydney Curtis and Nicole Sessions, Ms. Magazine | 10.17.2025
Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk of “moral decay” and see low birth rates as a threat to the future of humanity. In the mainstream media...
