The New Eugenics
By Nicholas D. Kristof,
New York Times
| 07. 04. 2003
One of the most profound and layered questions raised by recent
genetic advances is this: Do we as a species still want babies
born with genetic disabilities?
Science is scoring great successes in combating the 7,000 genetic
ailments that can strike our children — and that sounds
great. Yet it's difficult to draw a line where we stop "improving"
our species. Many disability activists argue that we're moving
toward a new eugenics, and I'm afraid that they could be right.
The first step toward upgrading our descendants will come in
the treatment of disabilities because the benefits are so obvious.
And so I sat down here in London with an expert on disability
and genetics, someone whose struggle with the issue is not just
scholarly but also personal — to me as well as him.
It all began when my British great-uncle, Sir Geoffrey Shakespeare,
had a son, William. That's right: he became Sir William Shakespeare.
(We in the family have always claimed to be related to the Bard
as descendants of his cousin Humphrey Shakespeare; it's a coincidence
that...
Related Articles
By Philip Ball, Quanta Magazine | 06.18.2026
Since its molecular structure was deduced in the 1950s, DNA has been hailed by many biologists as the secret of life. They’ve read and studied the information stored in the DNA found in the cells of living organisms, known as...
By Laura Hughes, Financial Times | 05.20.2026
Sophie and her husband are set to spend more than £100,000 in travel and medical bills as they fly between England and the US in their bid to have another child.
The couple are undergoing IVF treatment in New York...
By Gina Kolata, The New York Times | 05.25.2026
In a small, preliminary study, an experimental gene-editing treatment dramatically lowered cholesterol levels, perhaps permanently, after just one infusion, scientists reported on Monday.
If confirmed in larger studies, researchers hope the findings may lead to a one-and-done way to prevent...
By Nanette Elster, Kayhan Parsi, and Art Caplan, The American Journal of Bioethics | 05.06.2026
“Better babies.” “Fitter families.” “Survival of the fittest.” “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” These phrases are not merely historical reminders of the United States’ regrettable eugenic past but are appearing in an increasingly eugenic present. Eugenics may have seemed...