Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights Supports Lee-Halpern Petition
By Jerry Flanagan
| 02. 16. 2005
Robert Klein
Chair
Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee
Mr. Klein,
The eyes of the world are on California. New medical treatments and funding strategies developed in the world's sixth leading economy will become national models. The success or failure of the California experiment could decide the fate of stem cell research for years to come.
We are writing to express our deep concern with the failure of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine ("CIRM") and Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee ("ICOC") to guarantee an open, democratic decision-making process and disregard of state conflict of interest laws. The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR) calls on the CIRM and ICOC to support the petition filed by Philip R. Lee, MD, and Charles Halpern, JD.
When voters approved the unprecedented $3 billion in taxpayer-funded bonds to support stem cell research, they did so to provide access to innovative medical technologies for all Californians. However, the public availability of new medical technologies is threatened by a web of conflicts between those responsible for awarding research grants and the biotech and pharmaceutical companies who stand...
Related Articles
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Mullin, Wired | 10.30.2025
In 2018, Chinese scientist He Jiankui shocked the world when he revealed that he had created the first gene-edited babies. Using Crispr, he tweaked the genes of three human embryos in an attempt to make them immune to HIV and...
By B.A. Parker & Gene Demby, NPR | 10.29.2025
What do conservatives like JD Vance and tech executives like Elon Musk have in common? They, like other pronatalists, want to “save civilization” by having more American babies. But it wasn’t that long ago that some people wanted to save...
By Jallicia A. Jolly, Sydney Curtis and Nicole Sessions, Ms. Magazine | 10.17.2025
Pronatalism is an old idea with roots in eugenics and nationalism, that is now fashionable among far-right influencers and policymakers. They talk of “moral decay” and see low birth rates as a threat to the future of humanity. In the mainstream media...
