First test for stem-cell institute -- money
By Jesse Reynolds,
San Francisco Chronicle
| 05. 15. 2005
Funding mechanism must avoid conflict of interest
The authors of last November's successful Proposition 71, the stem- cell research initiative, asked California voters to trust them in two distinct ways.
First, they convinced voters -- in some cases with shamelessly exaggerated promises about the imminence and likelihood of cures -- to invest $3 billion in research that has potential but is still at an early stage.
The second request was written into the initiative in print so fine that few voters had a chance of understanding it. Using obscure legalese, the initiative exempted the state agency it created, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, from many of the hard-won legal protections meant to ensure effective and transparent state governance. The result is that the institute, an agency entirely funded by the California public, is being run according to the practices of private enterprise. It best resembles a publicly funded, privately managed venture capital firm.
Now this experiment is facing a major obstacle. Lawsuits are challenging the constitutionality of Prop. 71's exclusion of public and legislative oversight. The state attorney general has determined that the bonds to fund...
Related Articles
By Gregory Laub and Hannah Glaser, MedPage Today | 08.07.2025
In this MedPage Today interview, Leigh Turner, PhD, a professor of health policy and bioethics at the University of California Irvine, unpacks the growing influence of stem cell clinics and the blurred line between medicine and marketing. He explains how...
By Gina Kolata, The New York Times | 06.20.2025
A single infusion of a stem cell-based treatment may have cured 10 out of 12 people with the most severe form of type 1 diabetes. One year later, these 10 patients no longer need insulin. The other two patients need...
By Christina Jewett, The New York Times | 06.05.2025
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently declared that he wanted to expand access to experimental therapies but conceded that they could be risky or fraudulent.
In a podcast with Gary Brecka, who describes himself as a longevity expert...
By Mike Baker, The New York Times | 02.25.2025
As investigators struggled for weeks to find who might have committed the brutal stabbings of four University of Idaho students in the fall of 2022, they were focused on a key piece of evidence: DNA on a knife sheath that...