“Do We Want Science to Reinvent Human Aging?”
By Bill McKibben and Gregory Stock,
Transcript of live debate
| 03. 27. 2003
Daniel Perry, Executive Director, Alliance for Aging Research:
Good afternoon, my name is Dan Perry and I’m the Executive
Director of the not-for-profit Alliance for Aging Research.
It gives me great pleasure to welcome you to the second debate
under the banner of SAGE Crossroads. This is a project that
will continue for the next three years, bringing to light the
crosscurrents in our political life that affect the science
of aging. We know that there is a great deal of research going
on in the United States and around the world trying to plum
the secrets of human aging, and as it increasingly becomes possible
to modify the trajectory of human aging there will certainly
be consequences, indeed controversies, that go to our economics,
our politics, our religion and our sense of ourselves as human
beings.
Today’s debate is one that really brings focus very sharply
on this question, as we will soon hear from our two esteemed
participants, Doctor Gregory Stock, who is the director of UCLA’s
Program on Medicine, Technology and Society, and a widely quoted
lecturer...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...