“Do We Want Science to Reinvent Human Aging?”
By Bill McKibben and Gregory Stock,
Transcript of live debate
| 03. 27. 2003
Daniel Perry, Executive Director, Alliance for Aging Research:
Good afternoon, my name is Dan Perry and I’m the Executive
Director of the not-for-profit Alliance for Aging Research.
It gives me great pleasure to welcome you to the second debate
under the banner of SAGE Crossroads. This is a project that
will continue for the next three years, bringing to light the
crosscurrents in our political life that affect the science
of aging. We know that there is a great deal of research going
on in the United States and around the world trying to plum
the secrets of human aging, and as it increasingly becomes possible
to modify the trajectory of human aging there will certainly
be consequences, indeed controversies, that go to our economics,
our politics, our religion and our sense of ourselves as human
beings.
Today’s debate is one that really brings focus very sharply
on this question, as we will soon hear from our two esteemed
participants, Doctor Gregory Stock, who is the director of UCLA’s
Program on Medicine, Technology and Society, and a widely quoted
lecturer...
Related Articles
By Zusha Elinson, The Wall Street Journal | 08.12.2025
BERKELEY, Calif.—Tsvi Benson-Tilsen, a mathematician, spent seven years researching how to keep an advanced form of artificial intelligence from destroying humanity before he concluded that stopping it wasn’t possible—at least anytime soon.
Now, he’s turned his considerable brainpower to promoting...
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...