Reproduction 3.0
By Leah Ramsay,
Berman Institute of Bioethics Bulletin
| 02. 26. 2015
Untitled Document
The House of Lords in the United Kingdom voted to allow fertility clinics to apply for licenses to perform “mitochondrial donation” IVF procedures on Tuesday. The UK is the first nation to explicitly allow the procedure, which it had previously banned; the resulting child would have genetic material from her parents and also from a donor of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), with the aim of avoiding transmission of debilitating mitochondrial disease from mother to child. The procedure has never been performed in humans.
Meanwhile, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering clinical trials to test the procedure in humans, and is conducting inquiry into safety as well as ethical and social policy considerations.
The procedure is considered controversial because some say it would cross the “germ line,” or make a permanent, engineered change to the DNA that is passed down from mother to child. Previously this has been seen as an ethical line not to be crossed, but recently scientists and ethics scholars have come out in favor of its potential to allow...
Related Articles
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...
By Elise Kinsella, ABC News | 06.15.2025
When *Sarah and her partner needed fertility testing, it was Monash IVF that the pair turned to.
"Having a quick browse online, Monash IVF was one of the most prominent ones that came up on Google search and after contacting...
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 06.13.2025
IVF is “big business” and experts are concerned about conflicts of interest between profit-making and helping families have children.
Monash IVF’s second embryo bungle has sparked renewed scrutiny on the IVF industry as a whole amid calls for national regulation...