High Court judge approves commercial surrogacy
By BBC,
BBC News
| 05. 19. 2011
Laws in the UK are designed to try to prevent such arrangements, but Mr Justice Hedley said his paramount concern was the welfare of the child.
The most recent case the judge approved was last month, involving a baby born to a surrogate in the Ukraine.
The judge said he was "extremely anxious" about the current situation.
In Britain, the judge said, the only payment allowed to a surrogate mother was one of "reasonable expenses".
However, he has agreed to give retrospective approval for commercial surrogacy on at least four occasions.
"The statute does give power to the High Court retrospectively to authorise these payments and the reason we do so is not because we want to encourage commercial surrogacy but because of the impossible position which the child born as a result of the arrangement finds themselves in when they're back in this country," he told BBC Radio 4's The World at One.
Legal systems
Mr Justice Hedley, who specialises in family law, said it was important to highlight the issue because people were "getting into a mess unnecessarily"...
Related Articles
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...