As GINA is Signed Into Law, Most Predict Great Gains, But Some See Shortcomings, Others Find a Mixed Bag
By John T. Aquino,
The Bureau of National Affairs
| 06. 05. 2008
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
President Bush May 21 signed into law the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits employers, health plans, and
insurers from discriminating against individuals on the basis of
genetic information. The new law was applauded by lawmakers of both
parties and by health-related groups. After the signing, however, some
individuals and organizations, while acknowledging up-front benefits,
began to suggest that, long term, the new law might lead to loss of
privacy and threaten biopharmaceutical research and intellectual
property. Others discounted those fears, predicting the industries
will be strengthened not harmed.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), which was
introduced in Congress six times in various forms over the last 12
years and passed twice by the Senate but not by the House of
Representatives, was approved unanimously by the Senate April 24 and
on a vote of 414-1 by the House May 1 (2 LSLR 373, 5/9/08). The new
law (Pub. L. No. 110-233) aims to eliminate any fear of discrimination
by those who undergo genetic testing and thus encourage people to have
these potentially beneficial tests. The law amends the...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...