For a glimpse of what post-human athletes may look like beginning
in the 2012 or 2016 Olympics, take a look at an obscure breed
of cattle called the Belgian Blue.
Belgian Blues are unlike any cows you've ever seen. They have
a genetic mutation that means they do not have effective myostatin,
a substance that curbs muscle growth. A result is that Belgian
Blues are all bulging muscles without a spot of fat, like bovine
caricatures of Arnold Schwarzenegger.
These mutants may also point to the future of humans, particularly
athletes. Gene therapies are being developed that would block
myostatin in humans, and they offer immense promise in treating
muscular dystrophy and the frailty that comes with aging. But
once this gene therapy becomes available for people who really
need it, it'll take about 10 minutes before athletes are surreptitiously
using it, particularly because, in contrast to today's doping,
gene therapy leaves no trace in the blood or urine.
The standard human shape would become different, and anyone
with money could look like a body builder. As H. Lee Sweeney,
chairman of physiology at the University of Pennsylvania School
of Medicine, writes in a fascinating article in July's Scientific
American, "The world may be about to watch one of its last
Olympic Games without genetically enhanced athletes."
Even more important, gene therapy goes to the heart of an issue
that will turn our species upside down in the coming decades.
We are beginning to understand our own operating system - genes
- and we're gaining the ability to try to "improve"
our genetic endowment. If we do so, the ramifications could
be as enormous as when our ancestors first crawled out of the
slime to live on land.
Genetic tinkering gives me the willies. My concern is not so
much the details of blocking myostatin, although Belgian Blue
calves are so muscled that their mothers are at high risk of
dying while giving birth, as with the possibility that we will
irreversibly change what it is to be human. Geneticists have
tried to improve apples over the last 50 years, producing larger,
prettier species that just aren't as tasty or as interesting
as they used to be; it would be a tragedy if we did to humans
what we've done to apples.
Yet gene therapy also offers immense promise. Injecting genes
to block myostatin could help not only those with muscular dystrophy
but also anyone suffering the routine loss of musculature that
comes with aging. Instead of breaking their hips and limping
about on walkers, nonagenarians could run road races.
So far, the experiments have been very impressive. Dr. Sweeney
and his team injected mice with genes that resulted in muscles
15 to 30 percent larger than in other mice. And when middle-aged
mice were injected with the gene, their muscles did not weaken
in old age.
Other gene therapies are being developed that would prod the
human body to produce more red blood cells, a huge benefit to
athletes. In monkeys and baboons, these therapies led the red
blood cell count to just about double in 10 weeks.
A small number of humans have natural genetic mutations that
are similar, and these people appear to live normally and to
be exceptional athletes. For example, Eero Mantyranta of Finland
was a three-time gold medalist in cross-country skiing Olympics
in the 1960's, and his family later turned out to have a genetic
mutation that produced extremely high levels of red blood cells.
Likewise, The New England Journal of Medicine in June documented
a human version of the Belgian Blues, a boy with a genetic mutation
that interferes with myostatin. From the moment he was born,
he had extraordinary muscling, and at age 4 he can hold a 3-kilogram
dumbbell in each hand with his arms extended. A European weight-lifting
champion is said to have a similar mutation.
Perhaps the most important and complex decision in the history
of our species is approaching: in what ways should we improve
our genetic endowment? Yet we are neither focused on this question
nor adequately schooled to resolve it.
So we desperately need greater scientific literacy, and it's
past time for a post-Sputnik style revitalization of science
education, especially genetics, to help us figure out if we
want our descendants to belong to the same species as we do.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
biotechnology and public policy issues. We believe this constitutes a
'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.