Put Your (Frozen) Eggs in the Bank: Welcome to the Bioeconomy
By Victoria Turk,
Motherboard
| 02. 23. 2015
[Quotes CGS Fellow Lisa Ikemoto]
Untitled Document
Emerging reproductive technologies are helping address medical issues that affect fertility and give us more choice when it comes to family planning. But they also risk presenting our bodies from a new perspective: as a commodity to be banked, bought, and sold.
These social and political implications are the subject of a commentary in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences, by UC Davis bioethicist Lisa Ikemoto. She writes that “supply of the cells and bodies necessary for assisted reproductive technology use depends on market thinking and structural inequality.” In other words, the market depends on a discrepancy between rich and poor: Those who can afford to buy, and those who are in enough financial need that they will sell their eggs and sperm.
“The whole practice of egg donation, sperm donation, surrogacy, and I think in addition to that egg freezing not only for one’s own self but as a way of expanding egg banking for others’ use: All that relies on wealth inequality,” Ikemoto told me in a phone interview.
Her piece focuses on egg...
Related Articles
By Jorge Barrera and Rachel Houlihan, CBC | 04.09.2024
A Canadian DNA laboratory knowingly delivered prenatal paternity test results that routinely identified the wrong biological fathers — ruling out the real dads — and left a trail of shattered lives around the globe, a CBC News investigation has found...
By Neel Shah, The Preprint | 04.11.2024
Years ago, I interviewed for a residency position at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore. Standing before the domed Victorian building at the campus entrance, I couldn’t help but be in awe of the history of the place, the great...
By Eleanor Hayward and Joanna Crawford, The Times | 03.29.2024
Gazing out at the Mediterranean from an idyllic rocky mountaintop, Sophie Hermann announced to her half a million Instagram followers that she had decided to freeze her eggs. Since that post in August, the 37-year-old former Made in Chelsea star...
By Judith Levine, The Intercept | 04.04.2024
WHEN THE ALABAMA Supreme Court ruled that fertilized embryos were “extrauterine children,” it did more than imperil the future of in vitro fertilization in Alabama and, potentially, the U.S. The ruling, on the claimed “wrongful death” of frozen embryos...