Democrats and DNA Databases
By Osagie K. Obasogie,
The Huffington Post
| 09. 24. 2010
The Democratic Party has long gained political capital and much of its identity by holding itself out as a champion of civil liberties. From supporting free speech to protecting individuals' privacy, Democrats have presented themselves as defenders of the basic principle that government should protect fundamental rights, and certainly not trample them. Yet recent developments suggest that this commitment to civil liberties may be wavering in one important respect: DNA databases.
Three recent political maneuvers highlight a troubling trend: Democrats' endorsement of giving government unprecedented powers to expand the size of DNA databases by lowering the bar for collecting and retaining individuals' DNA samples. Earlier this year, President Obama voiced his support for storing the profiles of those arrested but not convicted of certain crimes in DNA databases, saying "it's the right thing to do."
Along similar lines, Governor David Paterson of New York has introduced legislation -- initially conceived by former Governor Eliot Spitzer, also a Democrat -- that will roughly double the size of the state database by including not only individuals arrested for felonies, but many convicted...
Related Articles
By Nada Hassanein, New Jersey Monitor | 03.14.2024
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration late last year approved two breakthrough gene therapies for sickle cell disease patients. Now a new federal program seeks to make these life-changing treatments available to patients with low incomes — and it could...
By Liz Baker, Debbie Elliott, and Susanna Capelouto, NPR | 03.06.2024
The Alabama State Legislature passed a bill Wednesday night granting civil and criminal immunity for in vitro fertilization service providers and receivers.
Republican Governor Kay Ivey signed the bill into law within an hour of it passing the Alabama...
By Daniel Gilbert, The Washington Post | 03.07.2024
Vitaly Kushnir’s fertility clinic offers to screen an embryo to predict a baby’s sex, but the service can lead to ethically murky territory, like when a couple wanted it so their first child could be a boy.
But the couple...
By Mary Ziegler, Naomi Cahn, and Sonia Suter, MSNBC | 02.22.2024
This decision will affect the millions of people who become pregnant each year, their families, and their health care providers.
Last Friday, the Alabama Supreme Court became the first in the nation to recognize frozen embryos as legal persons. The court’s...