DNA Databases Run Amok

Posted by Jesse Reynolds August 11, 2008
Biopolitical Times

Genetic forensics may assist in solving crimes, but the too-common assumption of the technique's infallibility makes it prone to implementation errors. In just a few months, California will expand its DNA database, by collecting samples from anyone arrested - but not necessarily convicted - of a felony. And it's already begun to use "familial matching." But before the Golden State moves ahead, its leaders should look to the challenges and controversies of other nations. 

In Australia, police must now review every crime seemingly solved using "genetic fingerprinting" - that's 7000 cases - after significant mistakes handling and testing samples in a recent case. And in the United Kingdom, which has the world's largest DNA database and has even considered expanding it to all residents, recent research by the Liberal Democratic party revealed that private companies have been allowed access for research purposes. Police officers, who have contributed their DNA voluntarily, were offered - and took - the opportunity to be excluded from the for-profit research. But most contributors neither have their consent nor had the opportunity to withdraw.

Previously on Biopolitical Times: