Public Interest Group Calls for California Stem Cell Agency to Investigate its Controversial Grant
Lawsuit alleges fertility center director lied to obtain woman’s eggs;
foreign corporation’s eligibility for public funds due to its recently
established non-profit California subsidiary
An
array of troubling questions has surfaced about a research institute
that was awarded $2.6 million last week by the California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) to pursue cloning-based stem cell research.
“The
leadership of CHA Health Systems has a shadowed recent history,
including a lawsuit that alleges the director of its fertility center
lied in order to obtain a woman’s eggs,” said Dr. Marcy Darnovsky,
Associate Director of the Center for Genetics and Society. “The CIRM
needs to live up to its oft-stated commitments to transparency and
responsibility by freezing this multi-million dollar award while a
thorough investigation is undertaken. If questions cannot be
satisfactorily answered, the grant should be rescinded.”
Last week, the state’s $3 billion stem cell research agency approved
the grant to a California nonprofit subsidiary, CHA Regenerative
Medicine Institute, established last year by the South Korea-based
corporation. CIRM grants are limited to California-based institutions,
and this round of awards was for nonprofit organizations.
“Did CHA Health Systems establish this subsidiary in order to pursue
California public funding, at a time when South Korea government funds
were unavailable because of the Hwang Woo Suk cloning scandal?” asked
Jesse Reynolds, CGS policy analyst. “Given the recent record of
unethical conduct in this field, the CIRM should have known to exercise
greater scrutiny.”
The medical director of
the CHA Fertility Center is the subject of a lawsuit filed by a woman
who says that he lied about the number of eggs that had been collected
from her, causing her to continue seeking treatment from him. The CHA
Fertility Center and the CHA Regenerative Medicine Institute are
located in the same Los Angeles office building.
“The
lawsuit suggests that CHA’s leadership placed a woman at unnecessary
risk by misleading her into undergoing repeated cycles of egg
retrieval,” Darnovsky said. “Women’s health advocates have warned about
the health risks of egg retrieval, as well as about likely conflicts of
interest between fertility doctors conducting egg retrieval and
researchers who want the eggs for their experiments.”
“Can we rely on existing CIRM policies, which amount to
self-regulation, when groups such as CHA are being awarded grants?”
asked Reynolds.
The Center
for Genetics and Society is a public interest organization advocating
the responsible use and effective societal governance of the new human
biotechnologies. It supports human embryonic stem cell research and
public funding for it, but has raised numerous concerns about the
California stem cell research program and the conduct, oversight, and
implications of stem cell research. For more information, see our
website at www.genetics-and-society.organdblog, Biopolitical Times, at www.biopoliticaltimes.org. |