Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About California Policies & Human Biotechnology


California has been a pioneer in several aspects of policy on new biotechnologies, most notably with the passage in 2004 of Proposition 71, which established the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) and authorized to distribute and oversee $3 billion in public funds to support stem cell research and build research facilities over ten years.

The CIRM has been closely watched by other states and countries. It launched two experiments: the first an experiment in biomedical investigation; the second in its politics and policy. Never before has a state so generously funded an emerging scientific field. And never before has a state been faced with regulating and overseeing a field that combines promising medical research with significant social risks.

Before that, the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning issued a report that led to a state ban on reproductive cloning. In 2003, a state agency blocked the sale of genetically modified fish as pets. In 2006, the state legislature passed a law providing protections for women who may provide eggs for cloning-based stem cell research.



DNA test flip-flop stirs debate at UC[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Victoria ColliverSan Francisco Chronicle August 28th, 2010Changes in "Send Your Genes to Cal" program provoke further discussion.
Class Cancelled: Media Coverage of UC Berkeley’s Retreat on Gene Testsby Jillian TheilBiopolitical TimesAugust 26th, 2010Two weeks after UC Berkeley backed away from its widely criticized “Bring Your Genes to Cal” program, controversy continues.
Marin Voice: Student guinea pigs at Cal?[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds and Marcy Darnovsky] [Opinion]by Alan MillerThe Marin Independent JournalAugust 23rd, 2010The best of plans do often go astray. Data from this study could be good for the university, but not end up serving the best interests of the students.
The $3 Billion Question: Kids, Scientists and CIRM[Opinion]by David JensenThe California Stem Cell ReportAugust 22nd, 2010Given the shortage of cash, should California fund stem stem research or schools?
Wider Debate Swirls Over Ruling That Curtailed Berkeley's DNA Programby Josh KellerThe Chronicle of Higher EducationAugust 19th, 2010Some researchers fear that the health department's position on the Berkeley project could have broader implications for academic research in California
UCal Berkeley Pulls Back Freshman Gene Tests[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes and Jesse Reynolds]GenomeWebAugust 13th, 2010The University of California at Berkeley will significantly modify its plan to run genetic tests on 5,000 incoming freshmen
UC-Berkeley Drops Part Of DNA Testing Program [Mp3 audio][Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Sarah VarneyNPR Morning EditionAugust 13th, 2010The University of California, Berkeley is dropping part of the program to comply with state health regulations.
UC Berkeley waters down DNA testing[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Victoria ColliverSan Francisco ChronicleAugust 13th, 2010Under pressure from state public health officials, UC Berkeley today said it will not allow participating students to receive personal results.
UC Berkeley drops plans to release personal genetic information to incoming freshmen[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Lisa KriegerSan Jose Mercury NewsAugust 12th, 2010The University of California Berkeley has dropped plans to release personal genetic information to incoming freshmen.
UCB Genetic Testing Program Altered After Decision By State Officials[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]KTVU / Bay City NewsAugust 12th, 2010A genetic testing program at the University of California, Berkeley will not include personalized results due to a decision by the state's Department of Public Health.
UC Berkeley drops part of gene-scanning program[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Marcus WohlsenAssociated PressAugust 12th, 2010University officials said they would abide by state finding that the voluntary gene scans must be treated as medical diagnostic tests.
Campus DNA Testing Program Will Not Release Individual Results[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Emma AndersonThe Daily CalAugust 12th, 2010UC Berkeley's controversial plan to test incoming freshman's DNA will no longer give provide individual students with their results
UC officials to explain DNA testing program for freshmen[Cites CGS]by Laurel RosenhallSacramento BeeAugust 10th, 2010A legislative hearing today will examine a controversial UC Berkeley program in which new students are being asked to spit in a tube so the university can test their DNA.
Stem Cell Education and Hypeby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesAugust 4th, 2010The embryonic stem cell lobby seems to be making a concerted effort to promote their technology.
Growing controversy over UC Berkeley's gene testing programby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesAugust 4th, 2010A California legislative committee will investigate the program, while more troubling facts are revealed.
Berkeley attracts DNA samples -- and political heatby Matt KrupnickContra Costa TimesAugust 3rd, 2010State lawmakers are turning up the heat on the campus, which solicited swabs of cheek cells from 5,500 incoming freshmen and transfer students this summer.
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacyby Bob EgelkoSan Francisco ChronicleJuly 14th, 2010The American Civil Liberties Union told a court that the government should not be allowed to take the "genetic blueprint" of someone who hasn't been convicted of a crime.
"Octomom" doctor accused of implanting 7 embryosby Shaya Tayefe MohajerAssociated PressJuly 14th, 2010Dr. Michael Kamrava's procedure allegedly leads to the death of a fetus
Familial Searching Hits The Spotlightby Osagie Obasogie Biopolitical TimesJuly 14th, 2010Controversial familial searches in forensic DNA databases helped lead to the arrest of a serial killer known as the ‘Grim Sleeper.’
Prop 71 mastermind proposes another ballot measureby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 13th, 2010The primary force behind the California stem cell agency asserts that the public should give it even more funds.
Medicine agency stays immune to budget cuts[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Katie WorthSan Francisco ExaminerJuly 11th, 2010The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine has not faced the budget cuts other programs in California have encountered.
California Legislators' Effort to Prevent Student DNA Testing Could Come Too Lateby Ferris JabrScientific AmericanJuly 9th, 2010A new bill is designed to halt Berkeley's controversial genetic testing project.
‘Grim Sleeper’ Arrest Fans Debate on DNA Useby Jennifer SteinhauerThe New York Times July 8th, 2010The arrest of the “Grim Sleeper” has put one of the hottest controversies in American law enforcement to its first major test.
Universities Bank on Stem-Cell Research[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Robert A. GuthWall Street JournalJuly 1st, 2010Bay Area universities and research groups are betting they can spawn a new generation of medical breakthroughs and the next growth engine for the region's biotechnology industry.
California Legislation on UC Berkeley Gene Testingby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 29th, 2010The state legislature may halt the controversial gene testing program at the University of California, Berkeley.
California stem cell agency bars public from meeting on eggsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 23rd, 2010The CIRM can ill afford to be perceived as closed to public participation.
Bending the Rules in Californiaby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 16th, 2010Susanne Schultz recently investigated two organizations which may be skirting California's laws prohibiting payments to women to provide eggs for stem cell research.
The dangers of growing DNA databasesby Osagie K. ObasogieLos Angeles TimesApril 9th, 2010The practice of retaining genetic samples from people arrested for a crime but not convicted is growing in the U.S. It has serious human rights implications.
Patricia Williams on DNA Databasesby Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesApril 6th, 2010In her latest column for The Nation, Columbia Law Professor Patricia Williams offers an insightful critique of a burgeoning law enforcement practice: taking and retaining DNA samples from individuals arrested for a crime regardless of whether they are ever charged or convicted.
Stem cell agency draws Capitol scrutiny – againby John HowardCapitol WeeklyMarch 18th, 2010Lawmakers - again -- are questioning the operations and culture of the state's stem cell program.
LA Times columnist's concerns over CIRM echo our ownby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 3rd, 2010One of the most prominent political commentators in the state has again taken on California's controversial stem cell research program.
Legal Updates: DNA Databases, Human Gene Patents, Octomom’s Doctorby Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesJanuary 17th, 2010The past few weeks have seen a number of legal developments involving reproductive and genetic technologies.
California's Proposition 71 Failure [Editorial]Investor's Business DailyJanuary 12th, 2010Five years after a budget-busting $3 billion was allocated to embryonic stem cell research, there have been no cures, no therapies and little progress.
California board accuses octuplets doctor of negligenceby Kimi YoshinoLos Angeles TimesJanuary 8th, 2010Dr. Michael Kamrava stockpiled embryos and failed to assess Nadya Suleman's mental health, panel says.
Judge allows DNA sampling for felony arresteesby Bob EgelkoSan Francisco ChronicleDecember 24th, 2009A federal judge refused to block a voter-approved California law requiring anyone arrested on a felony charge to provide DNA samples.
Two New Publications from Generations Aheadby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesDecember 22nd, 2009Reports from convenings on DNA forensics and communities of color, and on discussions among disability rights and reproductive rights and justice advocates.
Beauty, Brains, and Eggs [Video][Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]KCETDecember 18th, 2009Los Angeles's public television station examines the big and mostly unregulated business of egg donation.
California Awards Grants for Research Projects in Nonembryonic Stem Cellsby Andrew PollackNew York TimesOctober 28th, 2009In a tacit acknowledgment that the promise of human embryonic stem cells is still far in the future, California’s stem cell research program awarded grants using mainly other, less controversial cells.
ACLU Challenges California Prop. 69 by Osagie K. ObasogieBiopolitical TimesOctober 16th, 2009Prop. 69’s arrestee provision marks a radical expansion of the government’s power to indefinitely retain intimate information about citizens – many of whom may have done nothing more than be accused of committing a crime.
California warning labels: "Donating" eggs may be hazardous to your healthby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesOctober 13th, 2009A new first-in-the-nation law will require that ads recruiting women to provide their eggs mention the health risks entailed.
Celebrity Knock-Off Sperm? by Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesSeptember 27th, 2009California Cryobank recently launched its “Donor Look-A-Like” program, in which sperm donors are not only cataloged by typical traits such as hair or skin color, but which celebrity they most closely resemble.
More fraud and scandal in the California fertility industryby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesSeptember 21st, 2009The owner of a surrogacy agency vanished with about $2 million of her clients' money, leaving surrogates in mid-pregnancy with no health insurance to cover their prenatal care or deliveries.
Letter to Gov. Schwarzenegger regarding California egg bill [PDF]September 16th, 2009This letter from CGS to California Governor Schwarzenegger, urging him to sign a bill requiring the disclosure of health information during egg extraction
Letter to the California stem cell research agency's standards working group [PDF]September 16th, 2009The Center for Genetics and Society and the Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research wrote to the CIRM's standards group regarding its upcoming meeting
Chair of Calif.'s Health Committee Will Wait Until 2010 to Introduce CIRM-Altering Billby Alex PhilippidisBioRegion NewsJuly 6th, 2009Potential reforms to California's stem cell research agency will wait until next year.
California stem cell agency digs in deeperby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 1st, 2009California's stem cell agency fights back against a call for reform by the state's independent "good government" agency-and threatens a lawsuit.
Sacramento Bee: "Stem cell chief's exit is long overdue"by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 24th, 2009The editorial board of the Sacramento Bee says that Robert Klein’s term as head of the state's stem cell agency can't end soon enough
Stem cell chief's exit is long overdue[Editorial]Sacramento BeeJune 20th, 2009In the midst of a state budget crisis, the stem cell institute is an island, spending freely, accountable to no one.
California legislator introduces bill to address personal genome servicesby Gail JavittGenetics and Public Policy Center newsletterMay 31st, 2009A California state Senator recently introduced a bill to address personal genome services
What Obama's Support for Stem Cell Research Means for Californiaby Joe Mathews Scientific AmericanMay 21st, 2009What does the lifting of restrictions on embryonic stem cell research mean for an oft-criticized state agency with $3 billion in grants to give out?
California would remain on cutting edge under new U.S. stem cell policy[Cites CGS]by Lisa M. KriegerSan Jose Mercury NewsApril 22nd, 2009The long-awaited draft regulations from the National Institutes of Health means Bay Area scientists will continue relying on state and private funding to support much stem-cell research.
Moving in the Wrong Directionby Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesApril 22nd, 2009In recent weeks, both Nevada and Colorado are pursuing state laws that would place arrestees’ DNA in forensic databases, right next to profiles from convicted felons.
California stem cell program needs a new treatment[Commentary]by Michael HiltzikLos Angeles TimesMarch 30th, 2009The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine threatens to suck up precious fiscal resources of a state with none to spare and is rife with conflicts of interest.
CIRM Close-Hauled, Seeks Bonds to Sustain Headway[Cites CGS]by Constance HoldenScienceMarch 27th, 2009The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine is scaling back, rethinking its priorities, and looking at how to mesh its activities with those of the NIH.
Surrogacy in the LA Times: Military wives and missing paymentsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMarch 24th, 2009Two recent articles at the LA Times explore surrogacy: one a personal tale, the other regarding vanishing payments.
Stem Cell Decision Worries Some Scientists [Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Andrew PollackNew York TimesMarch 11th, 2009Obama's decision has removed the original raison d'être for the California program and others like it. And with most states facing severe budget pressures, it may prove difficult to justify spending the money.
The Latest on Stem-Cell Research in California [MP3 audio][Interviews CGS's Jesse Reynolds]KCRW's Which Way, L.A.?March 9th, 2009The President lifted the Bush restrictions on stem cell research. What’s the impact on California, where voters invested $3 billion five years ago?
Stricter rules on fertility industry debated[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Kimi Yoshino and Jessica GarrisonLos Angeles TimesMarch 6th, 2009Some doctors worry that octuplet mom Nadya Suleman's case may be used as a pretense to pass laws limiting abortion rights. Others fear a confusing patchwork of regulations.
"OctoMom" inspires bill to regulate fertility clinics[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Malcolm MaclachlanCapitol WeeklyMarch 5th, 2009The California Senate, as well as Missouri and Georgia, will consider legislation to regulate the assisted reproduction industry
California Senator on fertility industry regulationby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMarch 3rd, 2009A California state senator has taken action toward providing oversight for the state's unregulated fertility industry.
More cloning, but still no stem cellsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 12th, 2009Three more research teams have created clonal human embryos, but none reported deriving stem cells from them.
California Medical Board investigating 'standard of care' in octuplets caseby Caroline HedleyThe TelegraphFebruary 5th, 2009The Board is investigating whether medical assistance in the conception of octuplets constituted a "violation of the standard of care".
Politics enters state's stem cell research program[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Eric BaileyLos Angeles TimesFebruary 2nd, 2009Just as Obama's election opens the door to progress, Democrats and Republicans square off over a key appointment to California's stem cell research program.
Despite money woes, stem cell institute to award more grantsby Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneJanuary 31st, 2009Should the state stem cell institute keep approving research grants, even though it will run out of money about the end of September because of the state budget impasse?
Promise, peril seen with embryonic stem cellsby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsJanuary 26th, 2009California's $3 billion effort to fund human embryonic stem-cell research illustrates some of the obstacles to companies selling treatments.
Stem Cells in the Time of Fiscal Difficultiesby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolical TimesJanuary 22nd, 2009David Jensen challenges the state's lavish subsidies for stem cell research in a time of major budget cutbacks.
The danger of DNA: It isn't perfectby Maura Dolan and Jason Felch Los Angeles TimesDecember 26th, 2008By far the most reliable forensic science, it still has limits: Samples can be contaminated and may go untested for years. And collecting it may violate privacy laws.
California Stem Cell Agency Faces Cash Freeze S.F. institute considers its options, may sell bonds privately by Ron LeutySan Francisco Business TimesDecember 23rd, 2008The global financial crisis may do what opponents of California's $3 billion state-sponsored stem cell research experiment could not: dry up funding.
Klein Will Get Paid to Head CIRMby Ron LeutySan Francisco Business TimesDecember 10th, 2008The board of California's stem cell agency has voted to start paying a salary of $150,000 for half-time work to Chairman Robert Klein, who has served unpaid since the institute began four years ago.
Salary Plan at Stem Cell Institute Is CriticizedGovernor cites state deficit in opposing leaders' payby Terri SomersThe Union TribuneDecember 6th, 2008With the state facing a possible $28 billion deficit, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has expressed “deep concern” about the state stem cell institute's plans to set the salaries for the chairman and vice chairman of its board, two positions for which no one has accepted pay in three years.
CIRM won't give up on eggs for cloning-based workby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 3rd, 2008The California stem cell research agency indicates that it will continue its recent push for women's eggs for cloning-based stem cell research, perhaps paying if necessary.
Obama policy a lift for stem cell researchers[ Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds ]by Bernadette TanseySan Francisco ChronicleNovember 29th, 2008What is potential economic impact in California of the lifting of the restrictions on the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research?
Editorial: Stem cell institute in a harsh spotlightSacramento BeeNovember 24th, 2008The editorial board of the Sacramento Bee calls for reform of California's stem cell research program.
Submitted testimony concerning the California stem cell research programFor the "Little Hoover" Commission on California State Government Organization and Economyby Jesse ReynoldsNovember 20th, 2008Jesse Reynolds testified before the "Little Hoover" Commission on potential reforms to the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Bipartisan inquiry into California’s stem cell agency to hear from Jesse Reynolds by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesNovember 18th, 2008The Little Hoover Commission, an independent state body that promotes efficiency and effectiveness, is launching a study of governance issues at the CIRM.
Stem Cell Promises, Obstacles Remain Four Years After Bill's Approval[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Sandy KleffmanMediaNewsOctober 12th, 2008Four years after California residents captured worldwide attention by voting to spend $3 billion on stem cell research, many of the anticipated new therapies are at least 10 years away and numerous hurdles must be overcome.
California Stem Cell Program to go Under the Microscopeby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesOctober 1st, 2008The governance of California's $3 billion stem cell research program will finally face some long-overdue scrutiny.
DNA’s identity crisisby Chris SmithSan FranciscoAugust 31st, 2008If defense attorney Bicka Barlow and a growing group of skeptical lawyers and scientists are right, we have built our justice system’s use of DNA evidence on statistical sand.
California Licenses 2 Companies to Offer Gene Services by Andrew PollackNew York TimesAugust 19th, 2008Two closely watched companies, Navigenics and 23andMe, that offer wide genome scans for consumers have received licenses that will allow them to continue to do business in California.
Scientists: Egg Shortage Hurts Stem Cell Research [Quotes CGS' Marcy Darnovsky]by Marcus WohlsenAssociated PressJuly 30th, 2008Critics of cloning-based stem cell research say its promise is outweighed by the potential harm to women, a view that has prevailed among regulators. And there's a promising new approach to stem cell research that doesn't require eggs at all.
Calif. State Senator Vows to Push Life-Sci Bill Without More Stem-Cell Amendments[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Alex PhilippidisBioRegion NewsJuly 21st, 2008[Quotes CGS' Jesse Reynolds] California state Senator, Sheila Kuehl, authored a governance and drug-access bill opposed by the state's stem-cell agency.
Digging Themselves a Holeby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 15th, 2008In the wake of new methods of deriving fully potent stem cells without destroying embryos, researchers and advocates appear to be falling into two camps.
Stem cell lobbyists decide Sen. Sheila Kuehl isn't really craven, ignorant, mindless, and dumbby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 15th, 2008The chairman of California's stem cell research program took a long overdue step and resigned as president of a private stem cell research lobbying organization. But Robert Klein should keep the promise he made when he first took the reins at the CIRM, when he assuaged critics by promising to serve only half his term.
Letter of support for SB 1565July 15th, 2008The Center for Genetics and Society sent this letter to the California Assembly Appropriations Committee in support of SB 1565, a bill to modify governance of the California stem cell research program.
The New Push for Eggs for Stem Cell Research in Californiaby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 27th, 2008Recent calls by the leadership of California's stem cell program to toss aside a critical rule to protect women's health simply because it is interfering with the aims of a handful of researchers and biotech companies is far from warranted.
Calif. Cracks Down on Genetic Testing Startupsby Marcus WohlsenSan Francisco ChronicleJune 16th, 2008California health regulators have demanded that 13 direct-to-consumer genetic testing startups halt sales in the state until they prove they meet state standards
Letting Sleeping Dogs Lieby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 12th, 2008The leadership of the California stem cell research agency has commissioned a new economic report. Any realistic economic analysis may not be an effective shield in Sacramento during a period of drastic budget cuts, and by reviving past controversy, revisiting the economic argument may backfire.
Nature on California's "Cronyism"by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 9th, 2008In a recent issue, the editors of Nature - among the most gung-ho supporters of stem cell research - caution against the "cronyism" and "inherent problems" at the California stem cell research agency.
$271 Million for Research on Stem Cells in California[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Andrew PollackNew York TimesMay 8th, 2008California has awarded $271 million in grants to build 12 stem cell research centers in the state, even as one of the political rationales for the building program might soon disappear.
$227 million in grants going to build California stem cell labs[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Mary EngelLos Angeles TimesMay 7th, 2008California's voter-created stem cell institute is expected to award $227 million in grants today to seed a laboratory building spree at a dozen universities and research centers.
Contrasting Coverage of CIRMby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 7th, 2008The state's two largest newspapers each had a preview of today's CIRM meeting, yet they were quite different from one another.
DNA matches aren't always a lockby Jason Felch and Maura DolanLos Angeles TimesMay 3rd, 2008Prosecutors and crime labs across the country routinely use numbers that exaggerate the significance of DNA matches in "cold hit" cases, in which a suspect is identified through a database search.
California Takes Lead on DNA Crime-Fighting Technique by Maura Dolan Jason FelchLos Angeles TimesApril 26th, 2008California will adopt the most aggressive approach in the nation to a controversial crime-fighting technique that uses DNA to try to identify elusive criminals through their relatives. The state will search its database for relatives of unidentified suspects in hopes of developing leads.
State Probes 6 Online DNA-Testing Firms[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Victoria ColliverSan Francisco ChronicleApril 24th, 2008The California Department of Public Health is investigating consumer complaints against at least six online companies that conduct direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
The Many Hats of Robert Kleinby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesApril 11th, 2008The chair of California's multi-billion dollar stem cell research agency tries to juggle many hats, including those of advocate and lobbyist.
Child Abuse: UK Police Want Genes of 5-Year-Old "Future Criminals"by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMarch 18th, 2008A top UK police official wants to collect DNA samples from children as young as five.
Report from the CIRM Standards Working Group meetingby Susan FogelBiopolitical TimesMarch 10th, 2008Susan Fogel of the Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research filed this report on the recent meeting of the Standards Working Group of California stem cell research program, held on February 28, 2008 in San Francisco.
Another Bill to Reform the California Stem Cell Research Programby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMarch 4th, 2008For the fourth year in a row, the Democratic chair of the California Senate Health Committee, currently Sheila Kuehl, and her Republican colleague, George Runner, have introduced a bill to address some of the flaws in the California stem cell research program.
Elimination of conflicts of interest at stem cell institute target of billby Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneFebruary 23rd, 2008A bipartisan bill introduced in the state Senate yesterday would authorize California's Little Hoover Commission to investigate how the state stem cell institute's governance structure might be changed to eliminate inherent conflicts of interest.
Big Bucks Become Bigger at CIRMby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 19th, 2008If the CIRM's salaries skyrocket according to its plan, calls for its termination, such as the recent editorial in Investor's Business Daily, would likely grow more common.
Slow Calif. science plan a lesson for Mass.by Todd WallackBoston GlobeFebruary 11th, 2008The slow rate of progress serves as a reality check for Massachusetts and other states that have followed California's lead by placing big bets on medical research.
Financial analysts' advice on California stem cell research by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesJanuary 24th, 2008An editorial in a national business journal advises California to rethink $3 billion for stem cell research.
What to Expect in ’08: Stem Cell Researchby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJanuary 19th, 2008Prognostication is a risky endeavor, but we can't resist making a few general predictions about the world of stem cell research.
The Bullet Missed[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by EditorialInvestor's Business DailyJanuary 18th, 2008For Californians, the good news is that only a small part of the $3 billion in Proposition 71 bonds has been issued. So they still could save themselves a good deal of money by winding the program down.
Scientists Clone Embryo From Skin Cellsby Lisa AminABCJanuary 17th, 2008Ethical concerns about the California company that produced cloned human embryos
California firm’s cloning results are disturbing; may violate state lawPublic interest group cites three key concerns January 17th, 2008Today's announcement that a private California company has created cloned human embryos is disturbing. This work raises three concerns.
Looking a gift horse in the mouthby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 27th, 2007The California stem cell agency is preparing to give its first grants to for-profit entities. But instead of lining up, many businesses are claiming they'll stay away because too many strings are attached. This may be true, or the companies may be trying to game the system in hopes of more favorable terms. In any case, it does not justify removing the obligations that come with grants of taxpayer dollars.
2007 in Review: Controversy Escalates at California Stem Cell ProgramGenetic CrossroadsDecember 21st, 2007Despite a major court victory in May, the California stem cell research program spent much of 2007 dealing with stumbles and scandals.
Stem-cell Firms Resisting Cash LureInstitute Offers Grants with Strings Attachedby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsDecember 20th, 2007Although companies now have a chance for the first time in the institute's three-year history to apply for its money, they may wind up having to share some of their revenue and research. And that is giving some companies second thoughts about participating.
Solution to One Prop. 71 FlawA Letter to the Editorby Jesse ReynoldsLos Angeles TimesDecember 17th, 2007It's time for the Legislature to step in and reform Proposition 71. Board chair and Proposition 71 author Robert Klein has consistently worked against accountability and transparency.
ICOC OKs For-Profit IP, Revenue Policies Amid Probes of Alleged Conflict of Interest[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Joyce E. CutlerThe Bureau of National AffairsDecember 14th, 2007California's stem cell agency approved regulations covering intellectual property and revenue sharing requirements for commercial enterprises accepting state stem cell research money.
LA Times Calls for Proposition 71 Overhaulby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 12th, 2007Today, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times called for the California Legislature to modify Proposition 71.
Editorial: Stem Cell HousecleaningLos Angeles TimesDecember 12th, 2007Grants are great, but the California institute created to fund research needs to put its business in order.
Yet More Meddling at CIRMby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 7th, 2007New revelations of improper interference in grant applications by board members of the California stem cell agency surfaced today. These developments should stimulate the California legislature to alter the law to reform the board structure, and more.
Bids for stem-cell grants in jeopardy4 universities may have broken rules on conflict of interestby Sabin RussellSan Francisco Chronicle December 7th, 2007California's stem cell agency may toss out grant applications seeking millions of dollars for researchers because they included letters of support from deans who also sit on the citizens' board that governs the $3 billion program.
California Plans for a $750 Million Biotech Bank[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by David JensenWiredDecember 6th, 2007A new source of $750 million in funding could soon become available for the perennially cash-starved biotech industry, particularly stem cell firms. The plan has already attracted criticism and praise.
State Controller Calls for Audit Of Stem Cell Institute's Expenditures[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Joyce E. CutlerBureau of National AffairsNovember 29th, 2007California Controller John Chiang called for an audit of all proceeds of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, and for a review of whether Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee member John Reed violated conflict-of-interest rules.
Public interest group calls for CIRM Chair Robert Klein and board member John Reed to step downNovember 29th, 2007CGS today called on CIRM Chair Robert Klein and Board Member John Reed to step down following their admitted actions that appear to violate conflict-of-interest laws.
Undue Influence at the Stem Cell Instituteby Jesse ReynoldsSan Francisco Chronicle November 29th, 2007Amid the coverage of major technical advances, an all-too-predictable scandal erupted in California's stem cell program. The details reveal improper and potentially illegal influence on the allocation of public funds by a CIRM board member.
Grants are focus of third audit of stem cell institute[Cites CGS]by Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneNovember 28th, 2007State Controller John Chiang yesterday directed his office to audit the state stem cell institute, and he also has asked the state to investigate allegations that a member of the CIRM board violated the institute's conflict-of-interest rule.
Conflict-of-Interest Scandal at California Stem Cell Agencyby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesNovember 26th, 2007An all-too predictable scandal has erupted on the governing board of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Editorial: Tangled loyalties at top of stem cell instituteBehind conflict-of-interest controversy is real problem: The chairman's leadershipSacramento BeeNovember 25th, 2007In this editorial, the Sacramento Bee calls on John Reed and Robert Klein to resign from the board of the CIRM, and for the state Legislature to overhaul the board.
State stem cell board member asked to quit over apparent conflictby Sabin RussellSan Francisco ChronicleNovember 22nd, 2007A prominent member of the governing board for California's stem cell agency may have violated state conflict-of-interest rules last summer when he tried to reverse a decision rejecting a grant proposal by a scientist who works for him at the Burnham Institute.
States Assess Breakthrough On Stem CellsThose With Big Investments Vow to Continue Researchby Rick WeissWashington PostNovember 22nd, 2007Tuesday's announcement that scientists had found a noncontroversial way to make cells equivalent to human embryonic stem cells generated economic and geopolitical tremors through states that have invested in embryonic stem cell programs and research centers.
Jensen on CIRM; Klein on Clinical Trialsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesNovember 12th, 2007The premier observer of the California stem cell research agency, David Jensen of the California Stem Cell Report, published an in-depth review of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine.
Secrecy & ConflictsAmid success and shortfalls, California's stem cell agency reaches for curesby David JensenSacramento BeeNovember 11th, 2007Three years ago, California voters launched the state on a $3 billion journey involving the origins of life, cutting-edge science and medicine, big business, morality, ethics, religion and politics, not to mention the hopes of millions of people suffering from diseases ranging from diabetes to cancer.
If You're Afraid of the Answer, then Don't Askby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesOctober 10th, 2007The CIRM is rejecting the suggestion - from a state auditor - that it merely ask the Attorney General for an opinion on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.
Stem Cell Chief a Top Scientistby Jim DowningSacramento BeeOctober 5th, 2007Australian researcher Alan Trounson will head $3 billion California research institute
CHA Grant Application: Pushed or Jumped?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesOctober 4th, 2007When a controversial applicant for California stem cell research funds withdrew its approved request during its final administrative review, it seemed a bit disingenuous.
The God of Spermby Steven KotlerLA Weekly September 26th, 2007In an industry veiled in secrecy, a powerful L.A. sperm peddler shapes the nation’s rules on disease, genetics — and accidental incest
CIRM's New President: The Good and the Badby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesSeptember 17th, 2007The new president of the California stem cell agency brings a diverse set of skills to the table. But Alan Trounson's record as a businessman and advocate is worth a close look
[California] Stem cell pioneer to lead state's instituteby Mary EngelLos Angeles TimesSeptember 15th, 2007A pioneering Australian biologist who was among the first scientists to grow human embryonic stem cells in a laboratory will lead California's $3-billion effort to translate such research into cures for diseases.
A State Bill Passes, a Federal One Stallsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesSeptember 14th, 2007A California bill that would require the labeling of meat or dairy produced from cloned animals has passed the state Legislature. Meanwhile, a federal bill to permit generic biotechnology medicines has stalled again.
ISSCR Enters Local Politicsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesSeptember 7th, 2007Why would George Daley, the president of an international scientific organization and a top researcher at Harvard, take the time to write a letter to the supervisors of a rural California county? Let's look at some details.
CIRM Loses its No. 1 Scientistby David JensenCalifornia Stem Cell ReportAugust 27th, 2007The top scientist at the California stem cell agency, Arlene Chiu, will soon depart in a move that reinforces the importance of maintaining the organization's stability and finding a new, permanent president.
Don't Bite the Hand that Feeds Youby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesAugust 3rd, 2007Given the magnitude of Keirstead's promotional activities, his undisclosed personal financial interest, and his own statement of clinical trials "in about a year" back in 2002, his pronouncements on the timeline for embryonic stem cell trials should receive a great deal of skepticism.
Sacramento Bee to Klein: Stop Lobbying or Resignby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 17th, 2007The editors of the Sacramento Bee have called on Robert Klein to either cease lobbying for a controversial land deal (discussed here last month), or to resign as chair of the state's stem cell research program.
Editorial: Too many hatsby EditorialSacramento BeeJuly 14th, 2007The editorial board of the Sacramento Bee: "If Klein wants to continue to promote the Yolo project or any project that could overlap with his duties as a state official, he needs to resign from CIRM. The sooner the better."
Stem Cell Czar and Development Mogul: A Match Made in Californiaby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJune 29th, 2007In many ways, recent revelations about a large-scale development of farmland near Sacramento are typical. But this one has Robert Klein on the team.
Whichever Way the Wind Blowsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 24th, 2007A recent article on potential economic benefits from California's $3 billion investment in stem cell research has reference to the over-the-top - yet widely-cited - optimistic scenarios spun in an economic analysis that was widely touted, and funded, by the campaign to establish the state program - despite sharing an author.
[California] State high court declines to review previous rulingby Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneMay 18th, 2007“I think the lawsuit, although we didn't support it, was a blessing in disguise because it put the brakes on, so they could get policy in place before the big bucks started going out,” Reynolds said.
State Supreme Court Rejects Challenge, Clearing Way for Stem Cell Bond Initiativeby Joyce E. CutlerBureau of National AffairsMay 17th, 2007The California Supreme Court refused to consider a constitutional challenge to the state stem cell initiative, clearing the way for $3 billion in bonds to be sold to fund stem cell research.
First U.S. Public Funding of Research Cloning Tainted by Scandal and QuestionsGenetic CrossroadsApril 30th, 2007The California stem cell agency approved the first public funding of cloning-based human stem cell research in the United States. One grant raised especially troubling questions.
California Stem Cell Update: Internal Power Struggles and Pending LegislationGenetic CrossroadsApril 30th, 2007As the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) prepares to hand out its largest grants to date, the agency has hit troubled waters.
CGS letter on California's SB771April 4th, 2007CGS supports, if amended, SB771. We are concerned that the bill as currently written does not go far enough to protect Californians from potentially unfair pricing practices.
Public Interest Group Calls for California Stem Cell Agency to Investigate its Controversial GrantMarch 22nd, 2007Lawsuit alleges fertility center director lied to obtain woman’s eggs; foreign corporation’s eligibility for public funds due to its recently established non-profit California subsidiary
Creative DNA collection raises ethical questionsMSNBCMarch 19th, 2007Police, eager to close cases, secretly trail suspects to get their genetic IDs
Stem cell agency says it has fixed spending lapsesby Carl HallSan Francisco ChronicleMarch 1st, 2007State auditors have criticized California's Proposition 71 stem cell agency for loose contracting procedures and generous travel and meal allowances, but the program's chairman said that changes have been made to fix any concerns.
Institute will comply on all but one requestby Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneFebruary 28th, 2007A performance review of California's stem cell institute says the fledgling agency needs to improve several policies, better document how it reaches its policy decisions and further justify some salaries.
Researchers Push for Looser Rules on Procuring Women's EggsGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 28th, 2007Scientists who want large numbers of women's eggs for cloning-based stem cell research face widespread objections and concerns because of the risks that egg retrieval poses for women and the speculative nature of benefits from research cloning.
California Stem Cell UpdateGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 28th, 2007CIRM grant process reveals deep flaws; Legislature moves to ensure affordable treatments and returns on public investment; Appeals court ruling favors stem cell institute
Public Interest Group Welcomes Bill to Ensure Stem Cell Institute’s PromisesFebruary 23rd, 2007Center for Genetics and Society says California agency must provide for affordable treatments and returns to the state
CIRM grant process reveals deep flawsby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 22nd, 2007Last week, the California stem cell research program awarded its first research grants. Although the media coverage was universally laudatory, this milestone was not without significant shortcomings.
Unsupported conclusions on egg procurementby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesFebruary 13th, 2007The Institute of Medicine has issued its report on last September's workshop, held at the request of the California stem cell agency to assess the medical risks of egg retrieval.
[Editorial] Stem cell dollars flow; But grant process is needlessly shroudedSacramento BeeFebruary 12th, 2007"[U]nder the [CIRM's] shrouded procedures, it is impossible for anyone -- including researchers applying for grants -- to be assured that grant reviewers are recusing themselves at the proper times."
Will the third time be the charm for reform in California?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesFebruary 8th, 2007Many of the shortcomings of California's stem cell research program can be traced to its enabling law, which is deeply flawed. Legislative reform of Prop 71 is planned for the third year in a row.
The Biotech Bubble: Why stem-cell research won't make states rich.by David HamiltonSlateFebruary 6th, 2007As Congress hunts for ways to push its stem-cell bill past an expected veto, states are charging ahead on their own, but the economic rationale seems hopelessly optimistic.
A Penny on the Dollarby Chris ThompsonEast Bay ExpressJanuary 24th, 2007"The more details emerge about Proposition 71, California's $3 billion stem-cell research project, the more it all looks like a big lie that will cost us billions of dollars more than we were told."
Stem Cell Reality Checkby Malcolm MaclachlanCapitol WeeklyJanuary 23rd, 2007A University of California Berkeley economics professor has done an analysis of the financial returns likely to come to California from stem cell research--and he said they will likely be a small fraction of what proponents" say.
Opinion: Stem cell institute misses chanceby John SimpsonThe ArgusJanuary 8th, 2007The stem cell project director for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights calls for transparency at the California stem cell research program.
Interview with Marcy Darnovskyby Enola AirdThe Motherhood ProjectDecember 31st, 2006The Motherhood Project interviews CGS's Associate Executive Director on a wide range of human biotechnology issues.
Rich Donors Help Calif. Fund Stem Cell Researchby Sonya GeisWashington PostDecember 19th, 2006"Two years after California voters passed a landmark $3 billion bond measure for stem cell research, not a single bond has been sold and not a penny of bond money has been spent. The fund is caught up in court challenges."
Year in Review: Stem cell politics: Good, bad, ugly (Part 3 of 5)Genetic CrossroadsDecember 14th, 2006California stem cell program: How much progress since its "C-" grade?; Public funds and conflicts of interest mark stem cell programs in other states; The Bush veto and the new Congress
Year in Review: New policies, more controversy on eggs for research (Part 5 of 5)Genetic CrossroadsDecember 14th, 2006The public and political debate about stem cell research remains dominated by the divisive embryo issue. But some policy makers are beginning to address the risks posed by the procurement of women's eggs, which researchers want in large numbers for efforts to derive stem cells from cloned embryos.
California's Stem Cell Research Program: An UpdateGenetic CrossroadsDecember 14th, 2006The last month has witnessed a wide variety of developments at California's stem cell research program.
Should we rely on a "culture of compliance?"by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 14th, 2006We've long advocated for "effective oversight," but neither the stem cell research agency nor the institutionally-affiliated committees that it asks to approve each research project are accountable to anyone else. While a "culture of compliance" sounds good, that's another way to say "trust us." And I don't trust self-regulation.
State stem cell agency's president resigns [California]by Rebecca VeselOakland TribuneDecember 8th, 2006"The president of California's landmark stem cell agency resigned Thursday."
Two takes on "cures in ten years"by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesDecember 5th, 2006Two articles from the weekend highlight diminishing expectations for California's stem cell research program. Its governing board is meeting this week, and will approve a strategic plan that is in in sharp contrast to the exaggerated rhetoric of the Proposition 71 campaign that created the program.
Stem cell study group gets money, lowers expectationsby Paul EliasAssociated PressDecember 3rd, 2006"California voters, wooed by an aggressive, multimillion dollar campaign that promised cures to myriad diseases, overwhelmingly approved the nation's most ambitious stem cell research center two years ago."
Reality check for stem cell optimismby Mary EngelLos Angeles TimesDecember 3rd, 2006"Two years after California voters authorized $3 billion in bonds to fund stem cell research, the institute created to oversee the enterprise has just begun what experts see as a long and slow scientific journey."
Toward Fair Cures: Health Disparities and Stem Cell ResearchGenetic CrossroadsNovember 15th, 2006Toward Fair Cures: Integrating the Benefits of Diversity in the California Stem Cell Research Act was a first-of-its-kind conference on minority health disparities and stem cell research.
Stem Cell Research: Fact and Fictionby Caroline DobuzinskisMother Jones MoJo BlogNovember 3rd, 2006Stem cells have become the superstars of this election season, with their profiles raised by celebrities and ad campaigns. An interview with Jesse Reynolds, spokesman for the Center for Genetics and Society, shed some light on the realities of the issue.
"Stem cell czar" at it againby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesNovember 3rd, 2006Robert Klein, California's "stem cell czar," is inappropriately politicking again. This time, he's endorsed Democrat John Garamendi for Lt. Governor. It's my understanding that as an appointed state official, he is prohibited from endorsing candidates for office. The way he introduces his endorsement suggests he knows this.
A Pro-Woman Stem-Cell Policyby Marcy DarnovskyTomPaine.comOctober 26th, 2006"The need for young women to provide fresh eggs for cloning research, and the risks that poses, have been all but overshadowed."
California Victory: Standards and Safeguards on Eggs for ResearchGenetic CrossroadsOctober 20th, 2006California has become the first U.S. state to legislate a set of standards and safeguards for procuring women's eggs for cloning and stem cell research. The new law is a victory for women's health, for protection of research subjects, and for responsible science.
California Stem Cell Agency Moves to Dampen ExpectationsGenetic CrossroadsOctober 20th, 2006
Better Late than NeverScientists Discuss Risks of Egg ProcurementGenetic CrossroadsOctober 20th, 2006For the first time, stem cell scientists have convened a meeting to discuss what is and is not known about risks to women who undergo egg extraction.
Candid forecast on stem cell research hopes10-year outlook cautions against early results from $3 billion planby Carl T. HallSan Francisco ChronicleOctober 5th, 2006"State officials running the California Proposition 71 stem cell program issued a 10-year scientific spending plan Wednesday that suggests even $3 billion isn't enough to meet all the early expectations of stem cell research."
Stem cell plans include creation of embryo bankby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneOctober 5th, 2006"California's stem cell institute yesterday unveiled its plans for spending $3 billion in a 149-page, no-hype document that sets what experts and patient advocates described as conservative and attainable goals. "
Potential Conflicts of Interest at the CIRMThe California stem cell research program is compromised by two sorts of conflicts of interest. Proposition 71, which established the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), built conflicts of interest into the structure of the new agency. The proposition mandates that at least half of the CIRM's governing board, the Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee (ICOC), must represent institutions which are likely to conduct stem cell research.
Hope, unfulfilled promises on stem cell workby Sally LehrmanBoston GlobeOctober 1st, 2006"Scientists in many fields have sometimes exaggerated the importance of their work. But stem cell researchers seem uniquely inclined toward dramatic claims."
Governor Signs Bill Protecting Egg Donorsby LA Times StaffLos Angeles TimesSeptember 27th, 2006"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Tuesday signed a bill designed to protect women who donate their eggs for use in stem cell research."
California Enacts Law to Reduce Risks to Women Who Provide Eggs For Stem Cell ResearchSeptember 26th, 2006The signing of SB 1260, the Reproductive Health and Research bill, is a victory for women's health. The provisions of the new law will reduce the risks to women who provide eggs for cloning techniques used in stem cell research.
SB 1260 (Standards for Egg Retrieval for Stem Cell Research) Fact SheetSeptember 14th, 2006
Stem Cells in CaliforniaGenetic CrossroadsSeptember 14th, 2006
New Battle Lines Are Drawn Over Egg Donationby Lee RomneyLos Angeles TimesSeptember 13th, 2006"A spirited disagreement over payment has split feminists, with some calling compensation to research subjects coercive and others contending that banning it is paternalistic."
Donors Sustain Stem-Cell Effort In California Amid Funding Battleby David P. HamiltonWall Street JournalAugust 16th, 2006"Even as legal challenges have tied up funding for California's ambitious $3 billion effort to fund stem-cell research, big-dollar contributions from prominent Californians who stepped into the breach have kept the effort going."
California stem cell research program: The governor's blank checkGenetic CrossroadsAugust 4th, 2006
Stem-cell institute has money, will fund researchby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsAugust 3rd, 2006"Running with the $150 million loan it just got from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the board overseeing California's $3 billion stem-cell institute said Wednesday it will begin soliciting its first research proposals within weeks."
Editorial: Public confidence in stem-cell institute demands full disclosureSan Jose Mercury NewsJuly 31st, 2006"The agency should make an investment in public oversight and public confidence and overturn its staff's recommendation opposing full public disclosure."
Editorial: Blank-check stem cells - Governor missed chance with state loanSacramento BeeJuly 24th, 2006"There is a third wave of opinion on stem cells.... [ It] supports increased spending for embryonic stem cell science, but wants safeguards to ensure that researchers stay within clear ethical lines."
State Takes Lead in Stem Cell Effortsby Lee RomneyLos Angeles TimesJuly 21st, 2006"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday ordered a loan of up to $150 million to the state's voter-approved stem cell research institute, catapulting California into the lead as the nation's top public funder of the divisive research."
Gov. Schwarzenegger missed opportunity to establish oversight of California’s stem cell agencyJuly 20th, 2006Along with public funding should come public oversight. Instead, the Governor gave CIRM a blank check.
Third Re-comment on CIRM Medical and Ethical Standards regulationsby Susan Berke Fogel and Jesse ReynoldsJuly 18th, 2006The Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research and the Center for Genetics and Society submitting these third re-comments to the proposed CIRM Medical and Ethical Standards
Panel scraps stem cell discovery-sharing ruleby Sandy KleffmanContra Costa TimesJuly 15th, 2006"A panel deciding what benefits California taxpayers will receive from their $3 billion investment in stem cell research agreed Friday to remove a discovery-sharing requirement that the biotech industry vigorously opposed."
Biotech execs: No sharing of stem-cell researchby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsJune 30th, 2006"A proposal that would let the state share in any profits that result from its $3 billion stem-cell research grants and force researchers to freely disseminate their discoveries has riled biotech executives..."
California Stem Cell Missteps ContinueGenetic CrossroadsJune 29th, 2006
California Bill on Eggs for Research Approved by Assembly CommitteeGenetic CrossroadsJune 29th, 2006
Stem Cell Research in California: Lessons Learned [PDF]June 9th, 2006A one-page overview of the California stem cell research program.
Biotech exec's contribution called conflictby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsJune 9th, 2006"A fundraising foundation has received a $3,000 donation for California's stem-cell institute from an executive of a Bay Area stem-cell company, drawing criticism from a consumer activist for a potential conflict of interest."
Institute's chairman raps senator for billby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneJune 8th, 2006"One day before voters went to the polls, the chairman of the state stem cell institute sent a scathing letter to patient advocates around California alleging that secretary of state candidate Sen. Deborah Ortiz was on an _anti-research crusade._ "
$100 million fundraising goal setby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneJune 3rd, 2006"Having survived 18 months on $22 million in donations and loans, California's groundbreaking stem cell institute now aims to raise $100 million from philanthropists by next spring."
Initiative's creator keeps tinkering: Senator, oversight panel often at oddsby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneJune 2nd, 2006This longer article examines Sen. Deborah Ortiz's support for Proposition 71, and her work to reform it since its passage.
Editorial: Cellular mutationSacramento BeeJune 2nd, 2006"In her latest effort to reform California's $3 billion stem cell research institute, state Sen. Deborah Ortiz, D-Sacramento, has introduced SB 401, a proposed ballot measure that seeks to close gaps in Proposition 71..."
Editorial: Legal delays may be a plus for state's stem-cell effortSan Jose Mercury NewsJune 1st, 2006"But the delay has had the side benefit of allowing the stem-cell agency to solidify its planning, structure and regulations."
Document archive and additional off-site linksJune 1st, 2006
CGS and Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research further comments on CIRM research standards by Susan Berke Fogel and Jesse ReynoldsMay 24th, 2006
California Bill on Eggs for Research Unanimously Approved by CommitteeGenetic CrossroadsMay 12th, 2006
Pro-Choice, Public Interest Groups Call for Stronger California Stem Cell StandardsGenetic CrossroadsMay 12th, 2006
CIRM Court Ruling Does Little to Solve Its ProblemsGenetic CrossroadsMay 12th, 2006
Stem-cell Research Blasted from New Angle[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Michelle ChenThe New StandardMay 8th, 2006"Groups that support stem-cell research are warning that the state_s massive research-funding plan is not immune to narrow interest groups that could undermine the potential public-health benefits."
Key opinion pieces, editorials, and news articlesMay 1st, 2006Since the election, media attention moved from Proposition 71 as a referendum on approval or opposition to embryonic stem cell research, to focusing on the laws details and the complexities of its implementation.
CGS and the Pro-Choice Alliance for Responsible Research comments on the draft final CIRM research standards [PDF]by Susan Berke Fogel and Marcy DarnovskyApril 28th, 2006
Calif. Stem Cell Agency Still in Limboby Paul EliasAssociated PressApril 22nd, 2006"California's $3 billion stem cell research institute won an important victory with a court ruling rejecting challenges to its constitutionality, but the agency's finances remain in limbo while the expected appeals block much of its funding."
Editorial: For $10,000, you get ...Sacramento BeeApril 16th, 2006"Frustrated by lawsuits that have held up funding for California's $3 billion stem cell research institute, some of San Francisco's most prominent philanthropists are holding a gala fundraiser for this state agency on May 22."
Opinion: The legal lock on stem cellsby Jennifer WashburnLos Angeles TimesApril 12th, 2006"CALIFORNIA'S $3-billion stem cell program has encountered repeated setbacks since it was approved by voters 17 months ago. Now it faces an entirely new and potentially even more worrisome challenge arising from two powerful patents..."
In End Run Around Legal Challenge, California Gives Out Stem Cell Research Grantsby Carolyn MarshallNew York TimesApril 11th, 2006"California's program to study embryonic stem cells awarded its first round of grants Monday, drawing on money put up by state business leaders trying to move the program forward despite legal challenges."
Opinion: Stem-cell grants ought to hinge on public benefitsby John SimpsonSan Jose Mercury NewsApril 10th, 2006"Companies like Genentech act like committed socialists when it comes to taxpayers and the government bearing the risk of drug development. But they are greedy capitalists when it's time to parcel out the profits."
Stem cell agency's bid to get cash criticizedby Paul EliasAssociated PressApril 2nd, 2006"The board at the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine is considering a proposal to swap naming rights to research programs and office space in exchange for sizable donations."
Out-of-State Facility Demands Part of Stem Cell Research Royaltiesby Lee RomneyLos Angeles TimesMarch 30th, 2006"[T]he University of Wisconsin foundation that claims broad patent rights to all embryonic stem cell lines in the U.S. has vowed to demand payments from California. That could spur a bitter court fight...."
Opinion: Taxpayers must benefit from stem-cell researchby John SimpsonSan Francisco ChronicleMarch 27th, 2006"Prop. 71 promises public benefit, but whether that actually comes about will depend on the details of who controls the discoveries and how technologies and treatments developed from those discoveries are priced. "
Panel orders audit of stem cell programSan Francisco ChronicleMarch 9th, 2006"State lawmakers on Wednesday ordered an audit of the institute and committee created to spend $7 billion of voter-approved bonds aimed at funding stem cell research. "
Democratic Control and the Public Interest in the Stem Cell Debateby Marcy DarnovskyMarch 2nd, 2006Presentation at "California's Stem Cell Initiative: confronting the Legal and Policy Challenges, Boalt Law School," University of California, Berkeley, CA
Stem cell research growingby Richard CloughDaily BruinFebruary 27th, 2006USC announces plans to build largest institution in state, joining others with similar projects
Stem-cell oracles[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Dan PineJ. The Jewish newsweekly of northern CaliforniaFebruary 23rd, 2006Though still in relative infancy, stem-cell research holds great promise to cure juvenile diabetes and a host of other conditions, from spinal cord injury to Alzheimer’s disease to cancer. Is there a Jewish position on stem-cell research?
California stem cell program still missing the markGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 23rd, 2006
Ortiz wants audit of stem-cell instituteSacramento Business JournalFebruary 22nd, 2006"State Sen. Deborah Ortiz and 10 other California legislators have asked for an audit of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. "
Stem cell transparencyby EditorialLos Angeles TimesFebruary 20th, 2006"One issue the institute still must confront is making the financial disclosures of its scientific advisors open to the public."
Editorial: Stem cell institute responsive, to a pointSacramento BeeFebruary 14th, 2006"Clearly, the South Korean stem cell scandal, along with continuing political pressures in Sacramento, have had an impact on institute officials and their willingness to listen to the public's concerns."
State's stem cell institute adopts 2 ethics policiesby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneFebruary 11th, 2006"California's stem cell institute yesterday adopted two controversial but key policies that set ethical standards for research and establish a mechanism for taxpayers to recoup some of their $3 billion investment. "
Ethical Standards for Stem Cell Research [MP3]by Sarah VarneyThe California ReportFebruary 10th, 2006The governing body that oversees California's stem cell agency is expected to adopt sweeping regulations today that will direct everything from egg donation to disciplining researchers who violate the new laws.
State's stem-cell research needs independent oversightby Jesse ReynoldsSan Jose Mercury NewsFebruary 10th, 2006"After months of pressure from public-interest groups and legislators, the policies to be considered finally address many of the concerns raised by the critics. But some essential gaps remain to be filled."
Proposed Policies for the California Stem Cell Program Leave GapsFebruary 9th, 2006
Stem cell debate: Should women get paid for eggs?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Daniel LevineSan Francisco Business TimesFebruary 6th, 2006"It's not like it's great having women doing this for free, because then they are the only ones who don't stand to make money, but it's worse to pay them," said Darnovsky.
State laws bypass research banChristian Science MonitorFebruary 1st, 2006"Stem-cell initiatives flowing from legislatures and governors' offices continue to gather steam, including some that permit controversial human cloning to generate embryonic stem cells."
Stem cell research regulations mulledSan Diego Union TribuneFebruary 1st, 2006"Egg donors would be reimbursed, not paid"
C- for the California stem cell research programGenetic CrossroadsJanuary 27th, 2006
Opinion: Learning from stem cell stumblesby Jesse ReynoldsSan Diego Union TribuneJanuary 27th, 2006"The stem cell research atmospheres in South Korea and America _ especially California _ are quite similar. There's nothing that happened there that can't happen here. "
Stem cell profit rules urgedSacramento BeeJanuary 24th, 2006"Biotech companies that commercialize taxpayer-funded stem cell research would have to plan to sell the drugs at the "lowest available U.S. commercial price" to low-income Californians, a task force recommended Monday..."
Watchdog suggests stem cell policies for stateSan Diego Union TribuneJanuary 23rd, 2006"A taxpayer watchdog group is expected to release a report today outlining how leaders of the state's $3 billion stem cell initiative could develop policies to make stem-cell-based therapies affordable and accessible to Californians."
Stem cell effort mired in legal bog, global scandalby Carl T. HallSan Francisco ChronicleJanuary 22nd, 2006"Now, the state effort is a magnet for attacks. Research advocates in other states view Prop. 71 not as a model to emulate, but as one to avoid. "
Editorial: Stem cell falloutSacramento BeeJanuary 20th, 2006"The fraud perpetrated by South Korean scientist Hwang Woo-Suk is a setback for regenerative medicine, but it also serves as a rich learning opportunity for California's $3 billion stem cell research institute."
Watchdog Group Gives Stem Cell Institute Low Marks, Urges ICOC Chair's Resignation[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Joyce E. CutlerThe Bureau of National AffairsJanuary 19th, 2006California’s stem cell institute gets a C- in its first year of operation, the Center for Genetics & Society said in a report issued Jan. 18.
Other states looking to spend public money on stem cell researchCapitol WeeklyJanuary 19th, 2006"As more than a dozen other states pursue their own stem cell efforts, it appears California is in fact being used as an example--but in some cases, it is being held as an example of what not to do. "
Group wants stem cell chairman to resignby Marisa LagosSan Francisco ExaminerJanuary 19th, 2006"The nonprofit Center for Genetics and Society issued the opinion in a 30-page _progress report,_ released Wednesday, entitled _The California Stem Cell Program at One Year._"
Stem cell official on hot seat[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Rebecca VeselyOakland TribuneJanuary 19th, 2006"California's new stem cell institute, which voters approved 14 months ago, is falling far short of expectations, and its chairman should step down, a group said Wednesday. "
State's stem-cell effort criticized in reportby Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsJanuary 19th, 2006"A watchdog group issued a critique Wednesday of the state's 1-year-old stem-cell research institute, calling it ``a great disappointment so far.''"
Call for head of stem cell institute to resignSan Francisco ChronicleJanuary 19th, 2006"An East Bay biotechnology watchdog group on Wednesday called for the resignation of Robert Klein, chairman of the Proposition 71 stem cell agency known as the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. "
Group wants head of stem cell initiative to quit[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]San Diego Union TribuneJanuary 19th, 2006"The Center for Genetics and Society accused stem cell Chairman Robert Klein of misleading the public about the financial return and health benefits it would receive in return for its $3 billion investment in stem cell research. "
The California Stem Cell Program at One Year: A Progress Report [PDF]January 18th, 2006This comprehensive progress report critically evaluates the first year of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the agency running California's new multi-billion dollar stem cell research program. It assesses the CIRM's performance, assigns grades in key areas, and offers specific policy recommendations.
Stem cell head should quit, group says [California][Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Laura MecoySacramento BeeJanuary 18th, 2006"Robert Klein II, the campaign chairman who became the head of the state's stem cell agency's board, should step down from that job because of his failed leadership, the Center for Genetics and Society said Wednesday."
Opinion: A closer look at stem cell researchby M. L. Tina Stevens and Diane BeesonOakland TribuneJanuary 18th, 2006Tina Stevens and Diane Beeson assert that the stem cell research scandal is not about Hwang but the hyped and commercialized institution of modern science.
Public interest group gives the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine poor grades for its performanceThe Center for Genetics and Society releases progress report calling for effective oversight and responsible researchThe Center for Genetics and SocietyJanuary 18th, 2006The Center for Genetics and Society (CGS), a public interest and advocacy group, today released a comprehensive progress report critically evaluating the first year of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the agency running California's new multi-billion dollar stem cell research program. The report assesses the CIRM's performance, assigns grades in key areas, and offers specific policy recommendations. The overall grade it assigns for the CIRM's first year is C-.
Editorial: Promises to keepLos Angeles TimesJanuary 17th, 2006The LA Times, in a detailed editorial, issues a broad critique of the California stem cell research program and its authorizing law, Proposition 71.
Cash on hold, but stem cell work on [California]by Rebecca VeselyOakland TribuneJanuary 17th, 2006"Beset by legal woes, California's stem cell institute likely won't see voter-approved funds for another 15 months, yet its president said support for scientific research will continue."
Hold scientists accountableby Richard HayesThe Baltimore SunJanuary 17th, 2006
Stem cell experts keep active while funds lag in limboby Terri SomersSan Diego Union TribuneJanuary 13th, 2006"It will take at least 15 months for California's new stem cell institute to resolve court challenges and gain access to $3 billion that voters agreed to spend on the research, the institute's president said yesterday. "
Editorial: Stem-cell politicsSan Francisco ChronicleJanuary 13th, 2006"THE TRAGIC RISE and fall of veterinarian Hwang Woo Suk, the South Korean stem-cell researcher who was found to have fabricated his purported breakthroughs in stem-cell science...offers California a cautionary tale."
Controls on stem cell work pushedThe Sacramento BeeJanuary 1st, 2006"The South Korean stem cell research scandal could add fuel to state Sen. Deborah Ortiz's efforts to impose stricter controls on California's stem cell research program."
Opinion: Stem cell program to suffer fallout from fraudby Stuart LeavenworthThe Sacramento BeeDecember 29th, 2005"Rightly or wrongly, embryonic stem cell research is seen as the next big rainmaker in the biomedical field. With so much money riding on the outcome, some people are going to lie, cheat and steal."
Editorial: Phony clonerThe Sacramento BeeDecember 29th, 2005"Can California's $3 billion stem cell institute learn something from the misdeeds of South Korean scientist Hwang Woo-Suk?"
Promises Made, but No Resultsby K. Lloyd BillingsleyLA Daily NewsDecember 18th, 2005Stem cell initiative delivers no results
Stem cell scandal reverberates in U.S.San Diego Union TribuneDecember 18th, 2005"As a South Korean scientist defends against mounting accusations that he falsified evidence in a breakthrough stem cell study, researchers in California said the controversy has caused significant damage to a promising and fledgling field. "
California stem cell research continues to stumbleGenetic CrossroadsDecember 15th, 2005
Opinion: What California can learn from Korean cloning scandalby Nigel M. de S. Cameron and M. L. Tina StevensSan Francisco ChronicleDecember 13th, 2005"When apologists for 'therapeutic cloning' speak airily of hopes of cures, not only are they guilty of hype, they fail to disclose that every single cloning effort requires eggs. These eggs are not laid by chickens."
State's stem cell institute is still stuck in neutralby Terri SomersSan Diego Union-TribuneDecember 10th, 2005"In the 13 months since California voters approved spending $3 billion of their tax dollars on stem cell research, not a dime has gone to scientists. "
California's Stem Cell Program Is Hobbled but Staying the Courseby Andrew PollackNew York TimesDecember 10th, 2005"After nearly an entire morning of sometimes heated debate the other day, the board overseeing California's $3 billion stem cell research institute took action. It asked the organization's president to draw up a plan for how to draw up a strategic plan. "
Feb. 27 court date for Charter test of stem cell program; Foes say enterprise is illegal because it's outside state controlSan Francisco ChronicleDecember 7th, 2005"Alameda County Superior Court Judge Bonnie Sabraw set a trial for Feb. 27 to decide whether California's Proposition 71 stem cell program violates the state Constitution."
Stem-cell funding still mired in courtsSan Jose Mercury NewsNovember 30th, 2005"A judge Tuesday denied a motion to dismiss two lawsuits challenging the legality of California's year-old $3 billion stem-cell institute, making it likely public funding for the institute will continue to be blocked well into next year."
Stem cell program wins key court ruling, poised to issue grantsSan Francisco ChronicleNovember 30th, 2005"California's embattled Proposition 71 stem cell program took a big step Tuesday toward overcoming lawsuits that have blocked its first grants from being issued."
Editorial: Oocytes for sale?Sacramento BeeNovember 25th, 2005"Although it remains unclear what Hwang knew or didn't know about the origins of the eggs, the episode should serve as a lesson for California's stem cell institute."
Scrambled eggs [California]by Tali WoodwardSan Francisco Bay GuardianNovember 16th, 2005"Could an international stem cell consortium make San Francisco the center of an emerging market in human ova?"
'Stem cell hub' cloning network project foldingby Carl T. HallSan Francisco ChronicleNovember 15th, 2005"A global consortium designed to pursue a controversial type of stem cell research involving cloned embryos is collapsing amid ethical questions surrounding human egg donations in South Korea. "
Stem-Cell Rift Shows Difficulty Obtaining Eggsby Antonio RegaladoWall Street JournalNovember 14th, 2005"THE BREAKUP of a U.S.-Korean scientific partnership on Friday may derail what supporters had hoped would become a promising source of research into cloning and human embryonic stem cells."
Editorial: Science and DemocracySan Francisco ChronicleNovember 13th, 2005"Now that California taxpayers know that the $3 billion ($6 billion with debt service) that they voted in 2004 to spend on stem-cell research may possibly be an outright grant of money for research rather than an investment, does it make a difference?"
California Stem Cell Program: A Billion-Dollar Bait And Switch?Genetic CrossroadsNovember 10th, 2005
Opinion: Stem cell royalty promise just election ruse?by Stuart LeavenworthSacramento BeeNovember 7th, 2005Proposition 71 and CIRM chairman Robert Klein admits that he knew of the tax consequences of returns to the state during the campaign, but declines to say why he did not inform voters, in this column by Stuart Leavenworth.
Beeson et al Amicus briefby Steven N.H. Wood
Committees Hear Debate on IP, Royalties Under State's $3 Billion Stem Cell Initiative[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Joyce E. CutlerThe Bureau of National AffairsNovember 2nd, 2005Requiring royalties or returns to California on the voter-approved $3 billion stem cell research bond act was the topic of a joint hearing of several state legislative committees.
Stem cell center studies ways to protect egg donorsSan Francisco ExaminerNovember 2nd, 2005"Officials at California_s new stem cell institute say they are determined to figure out the best way to protect the health of women who donate their eggs for medical research, the first time a public agency in the U.S. has addressed that question."
Debate grows over return from stem cell program [California]by Sandy KleffmanContra Costa TimesNovember 1st, 2005"During the campaign for California's $3 billion stem cell initiative, supporters predicted as much as $1 billion would be returned to state coffers through royalties from stem cell therapies. But now, some question whether the state will get a dime."
Testimony: Stem Cell Research and Intellectual PropertyCalifornia Legislature Joint Informational Hearing on Implementation of Proposition 71by Jesse Reynolds, Director of Project on Biotechnology Accountability, Center for Genetics and SocietyOctober 31st, 2005
Tax law casts doubt on stem cell royalties: State may not reap billions promised to voters last fallby Bernadette TanseySan Francisco ChronicleOctober 25th, 2005Not only might the the billion dollars in potential royalties to California turn out to be difficult to obtain, but the Proposition 71 campaign knew of the difficulties in obtaining them during the campaign.
California Stem Cell Research Leader Misled VotersNews reports say that chair of new state agency was aware of the billion-dollar problem during the campaignOctober 25th, 2005
Echoes of eugenics movement in stem cell debateby Carl T. HallSan Francisco ChronicleOctober 24th, 2005"Historians are drawing some intriguing connections between the contemporary debate over human embryonic stem cell research and California's unsavory, and mostly forgotten, eugenics movement of the last century."
Social Justice in the Gene Age: California’s Challenge [PDF]by Marcy DarnovskyOctober 21st, 2005Presentation at "From Eugenics to Designer Babies: Engineering the California Dream," Sacramento, CA
An Offshore Haven for Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research?New England Journal of MedicineOctober 20th, 2005South Korean researchers "planning to offer researchers in the United States and other countries a chance to work with such cell lines without having to make them themselves."
Stem-Cell WonderlandWill cures be affordable to all?by Ralph BraveSacramento News & ReviewOctober 20th, 2005Ralph Brave reviews the tensions between the realities and promises of stem cell research and California's Proposition 71. In a sidebar, he touches on the importance of intellectual property rights.
Opinion: State needs return on investment in stem-cell studiesby Jerry Flanagan and Deborah BurgerSan Jose Mercury NewsOctober 11th, 2005Representatives of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and the California Nurses Association argue that California should have a share of any profits from state funded stem cell research.
Embryonic stateCommittee sorting out ethics (issues) of California's stem cell research program moving slowlyby Sandi DolbeeSan Diego Union TribuneOctober 10th, 2005Nearly a year after voters authorized a $3 billion investment for stem cell research in this state, the committee formed to sort out the ethical and medical details have only taken baby steps.
Editorial: Save the Stem CellsThe Daily CalifornianOctober 4th, 2005UC Berkeley's student newspaper: "[T]he state legislature may make a big mistake by adopting provisions of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Patent and Trademark Act.... But Bayh-Dole benefits industry more than it helps universities."
Stem cell measure vetoed [California]by Carl T. HallSan Francisco ChronicleOctober 1st, 2005"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed a bill that would have added an audit requirement and egg-donor protections to the California stem cell program created by Proposition 71 in November's election."
Stem cell leaders to talk strategy at conferenceby Carl T. HallSan Francisco Chronicle September 30th, 2005Research prospects more realistic in short term, some say
CALIFORNIA STEM CELL PROGRAM: CONTINUING CONTROVERSYGenetic CrossroadsSeptember 29th, 2005
Who will benefit more, consumers or drug firms? [California]by Steve JohnsonSan Jose Mercury NewsSeptember 29th, 2005A consumer watchdog group has revealed that 13 of the 16 institutions to receive the first round of grants from California's stem cell research program have ties to major biomedical companies.
Human Plants, Human HarvestThe Hidden History of California EugenicsSeptember 27th, 2005This 2005 exhibit was the first to be exclusively devoted to the history of eugenics in California.
Stem cell_s shell game?Capitol WeeklySeptember 22nd, 2005"The biggest question surrounding stem cell research in California right now isn_t whether it will eventually cure devastating health problems. It_s what happened to the billion dollars."
Editorial: Stem cell oversight board is flying blindSacramento BeeSeptember 18th, 2005"Their own rules mean multimillion-dollar decisions are based on two-page memos."
Stem cell research: cutting-edge science or corporate subsidies, courtesy of voters?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]Capitol WeeklySeptember 15th, 2005Malcolm Maclachlan of the Capitol Weekly reviews the public interest criticism of the CIRM, focusing on the intellectual property issues.
Ex-movie chief keeps big role in health careby Laura MecoySacramento BeeSeptember 12th, 2005Sherry Lansing has become a leader on the state's stem cell oversight board and a member of the committee advising Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on educational reforms.
Displaying 1-300 of 547  
Next >> 
Last Page » 
« Show Complete List » 


ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.625.0819 • (F) 1.510.665.8760