Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About Personal Genomics


Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is an emerging, highly publicized industry, despite considerable skepticism among experts. Advances in sequencing and genomics have revealed some correlations between particular genetic sequences and certain diseases, physical characteristics, and behaviors, though these relationships are not perfectly understood. Nevertheless, entrepreneurs have seized on these correlations to sell tests that purport to indicate whether the customer has an increased risk of a disease or other characteristic. Similarly, associations of genetic sequences with specific geographical locations have led to commercial “ancestry tests.”

Evaluating the claims of these companies is difficult, since their technologies are typically kept private and there is minimal oversight. Medical tests are supposed to be supervised by a physician, and testing laboratories need to be licensed. California has worked with Navigenics and 23andMe, two of the best-known companies, to ensure that they are operating legally in the state, but these Internet-based businesses raise regulatory concerns that cross state boundaries.

This industry may contribute to an over-emphasis on genes as determinants, possibly at the expense of environmental, economic and social considerations. A further concern is the possible use of DNA databases developed by private companies, whose business plans include profiting from the compiled data. Finally, although the companies insist that they will respect the privacy of their customers, there is no effective guarantee.



“Me” Medicine and Public Healthby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesSeptember 8th, 2010Is personalized medicine the next great advance in health care, or an approach with some merits and some troubling implications?
The Great Gene Hunt (cont'd)by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesSeptember 3rd, 2010Accurate reporting and headlines should not be noteworthy, but when it comes to genetics they are -- and Reuters got one right.
The Tempest: Following the Storm of Reactions after the GAO Reportby Jillian TheilBiopolitical TimesSeptember 1st, 2010The GAO report kicks up a flurry of reactions, from applause to pushback.
The genetic mystique of ‘me’ medicine [Opinion]by Donna DickensonThe Globe and MailAugust 28th, 2010Are we simply our genes? Is that why we’re unique? Guess again
DNA test flip-flop stirs debate at UC[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Victoria ColliverSan Francisco Chronicle August 28th, 2010Changes in "Send Your Genes to Cal" program provoke further discussion.
Class Cancelled: Media Coverage of UC Berkeley’s Retreat on Gene Testsby Jillian TheilBiopolitical TimesAugust 26th, 2010Two weeks after UC Berkeley backed away from its widely criticized “Bring Your Genes to Cal” program, controversy continues.
Marin Voice: Student guinea pigs at Cal?[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds and Marcy Darnovsky] [Opinion]by Alan MillerThe Marin Independent JournalAugust 23rd, 2010The best of plans do often go astray. Data from this study could be good for the university, but not end up serving the best interests of the students.
Wider Debate Swirls Over Ruling That Curtailed Berkeley's DNA Programby Josh KellerThe Chronicle of Higher EducationAugust 19th, 2010Some researchers fear that the health department's position on the Berkeley project could have broader implications for academic research in California
UCal Berkeley Pulls Back Freshman Gene Tests[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes and Jesse Reynolds]GenomeWebAugust 13th, 2010The University of California at Berkeley will significantly modify its plan to run genetic tests on 5,000 incoming freshmen
UC-Berkeley Drops Part Of DNA Testing Program [Mp3 audio][Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Sarah VarneyNPR Morning EditionAugust 13th, 2010The University of California, Berkeley is dropping part of the program to comply with state health regulations.
UC Berkeley waters down DNA testing[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Victoria ColliverSan Francisco ChronicleAugust 13th, 2010Under pressure from state public health officials, UC Berkeley today said it will not allow participating students to receive personal results.
UC Berkeley drops plans to release personal genetic information to incoming freshmen[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Lisa KriegerSan Jose Mercury NewsAugust 12th, 2010The University of California Berkeley has dropped plans to release personal genetic information to incoming freshmen.
UCB Genetic Testing Program Altered After Decision By State Officials[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]KTVU / Bay City NewsAugust 12th, 2010A genetic testing program at the University of California, Berkeley will not include personalized results due to a decision by the state's Department of Public Health.
UC Berkeley drops part of gene-scanning program[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Marcus WohlsenAssociated PressAugust 12th, 2010University officials said they would abide by state finding that the voluntary gene scans must be treated as medical diagnostic tests.
Campus DNA Testing Program Will Not Release Individual Results[Quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]by Emma AndersonThe Daily CalAugust 12th, 2010UC Berkeley's controversial plan to test incoming freshman's DNA will no longer give provide individual students with their results
Public Interest Group Applauds End of UC Berkeley’s Controversial Genetic Testing of Incoming StudentsCenter for Genetics and Society, others previously raised concerns, called for the program’s haltAugust 12th, 2010The University says its researchers will now use students’ genetic samples provided for aggregate analysis only, and will not provide results to individual students.
Critics Confront Berkeley at Genetic Testing Hearingby Laurel RosenhallSacramento BeeAugust 11th, 2010UC Berkeley professors defended a controversial plan to perform genetic testing on incoming freshmen during a legislative hearing.
UC officials to explain DNA testing program for freshmen[Cites CGS]by Laurel RosenhallSacramento BeeAugust 10th, 2010A legislative hearing today will examine a controversial UC Berkeley program in which new students are being asked to spit in a tube so the university can test their DNA.
"Weak and Meaningless" Guidelines for UK DTC Testsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesAugust 10th, 2010The UK Human Genetics Commission's "A Common Framework of Principles for direct-to-consumer genetic testing services" rejects government regulation and relies entirely on voluntary guidelines.
Oversight Agencies Crash the Spit Partyby Jillian TheilBiopolitical TimesAugust 5th, 2010Recent events involving oversight agencies have made a strong case for federal regulation of the DTC industry
Displaying 1-20 of 181  
Next >> 
Last Page » 
« Show Complete List » 


ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.625.0819 • (F) 1.510.665.8760