Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About Inheritable Genetic Modification


The Basic Science

Frequently Asked Questions

Arguments Pro & Con

Mitochondria Replacement

Inheritable genetic modification (IGM, also called germline engineering) means changing the genes passed on to future generations. The genetic changes would be made in eggs, sperm or early embryos; modified genes would appear not only in the person who developed from that gamete or embryo, but also in all succeeding generations. IGM has not been tried in humans. It would be by far the most consequential type of genetic modification as it would open the door to irreversibly altering the human species.

Proposals for inheritable genetic modification in humans combine techniques involving in vitro fertilization (IVF), gene transfer, stem cells and research cloning.



How are Humans Going to Become Extinct?by Sean CoughlanBBC NewsApril 25th, 2013Experiments in areas such as synthetic biology, nanotechnology and machine intelligence are hurtling forward into the territory of the unintended and unpredictable.
“World's First GM Babies Born”: 12-Year-Old Article Continues to Cause Confusionby Jessica CussinsBiopolitical TimesApril 25th, 2013An undated Daily Mail article that is actually over a decade old continues to spread misinformation about human genetic modification.
The Baby Blueprint [VIDEO][With CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]Al Jazeera EnglishApril 22nd, 2013Would you choose your child's genetic potential? Live debate with Marcy Darnovsky, Stuart Newman, Julian Savulescu, and Nita Farahany.
Lord Robert Winston Warning Over Child ‘Eugenics’ by Lyndsay BucklandScotsmanApril 11th, 2013A leading fertility expert warns that reproductive technologies could enable a form of eugenics with serious implications for the individuals involved and society in general.
Three-Parent Children in UK Possible After HFEA Report[Quotes the Center for Genetics and Society]by Michael CookBioEdgeApril 6th, 2013The UK fertility regulator's report to the government misrepresented its own findings about public opinion.
New gene therapy births 'designer baby' fearsby Gavin O'TooleAl Jazeera (English)April 3rd, 2013Critics say the move would be the first step towards the creation of "designer babies" and herald a new era of "consumer eugenics."
New Technology Can Make It So 1 Baby Has 3 Parents[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]CBS New YorkMarch 29th, 2013“People have characterized this as sliding down a slippery slope. This one actually throws us off a cliff."
Are Parents Entitled To Create A Dream Child? [VIDEO][With CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]HuffPost LiveMarch 29th, 2013What if science allowed prospective parents to create smarter and healthier babies? This idea is just as exciting as it is alarming, but is it realistic? Should it be?
UK May Be Close To Approving Nuclear Transfer Technique for IVF[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by John FarrellForbesMarch 28th, 2013The conception of children who share the genes of three parents could be one step closer to reality.
GM Crops Evil, GM Children OK?by Chris BennettWestern Farm PressMarch 27th, 2013China is surging ahead with a research project aimed at identifying millions of genetic variations in order to boost intelligence.
Broad Public Support for "3-Parent Babies" and Crossing the Human Germline? Not What the Data Sayby Jessica Cussins & Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMarch 21st, 2013The UK regulatory agency’s summary of its public consultation on mitochondria replacement highlights "broad public support" for a procedure that would cross a crucial ethical and policy line. But that support is not actually demonstrated in its data.
Alarm over genetic control of embryos[Letter to the editor]The Times [UK]March 20th, 2013If the proposed procedures are allowed, the reconstructed egg or embryo will have an altered, and inheritable, genetic composition.
HealthWatch: Britain Considers Allowing Babies From 3 Parents [Video][With CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Kim MulvihillCBS San FranciscoMarch 20th, 2013Britain's fertility regulator says it has found broad public support for in vitro fertilization techniques that allow babies to be created with DNA from three people for couples at risk of passing on potentially fatal genetic diseases.
Grocers Won’t Sell Altered Fish, Groups Sayby Andrew PollackThe New York TimesMarch 20th, 2013Several supermarket chains have pledged not to sell what could become the first genetically modified animal to reach the nation’s dinner plates — a salmon engineered to grow about twice as fast as normal.
Three-Person IVF Moves Closer in UKby James GallagherBBC NewsMarch 20th, 2013The UK has moved closer to becoming the first country to allow the creation of babies from three people.
Eugenics Fear Over Gene Modification[Letter to the Editor]by David King et al.The GuardianMarch 15th, 2013The benefits of mitochondrial replacement are heavily outweighed by the risks to the child and to society.
Experiments with Inheritable Genetic Modificationby Jessica CussinsBiopolitical TimesMarch 13th, 2013A developmental biologist looks carefully at research on mitochondria replacement that would be an experimental form of human inheritable genetic modification.
Book Review: Transhumanist Dreams and Dystopian Nightmaresby John GallowayBioNewsMarch 11th, 2013Some say we should use genetic science not simply to ameliorate the human predicament but to transcend it. Of course this raises the issue of what 'best' means and, in any event, who decides.
The British Embryo Authority and the Chamber of Eugenicsby Stuart A. NewmanHuffington PostMarch 11th, 2013Mitochondria replacement would be a misuse of technology with clear potential for individual and social harms.
GM Babies?by Jessica CussinsBiopolitical TimesMarch 5th, 2013A debate about genetically engineered babies is hijacked by slick rhetoric.
Meet the New Eugenics, Same as the Old Eugenicsby Gina Maranto, Biopolitical Times guest contributorBiopolitical TimesMarch 4th, 2013According to a new wave of eugenic advocacy, “we” have a “moral obligation” to enhance future generations.
Mitochondria ReplacementLearn more about controversial research on mitochondria replacement: how it works, where the research is taking place, the social and ethical implications, and how you can get involved in the discussion.
Al Gore: Human Biotech is a “Driver of Global Change”by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesFebruary 21st, 2013In his recently released best-seller The Future: Six Drivers of Global Change, Al Gore calls for protocols to guide decisions about human genetic modification.
Exaggerations and Misrepresentations Have No Place in Science Policy Debatesby Jeremy GruberCouncil for Responsible GeneticsFebruary 15th, 2013A recent debate on whether we should prohibit genetically engineered babies wound up focusing on mitochondrial replacement techniques.
Neanderthal Clone Poll Finds Most Americans Oppose Cloning Human Relative by Emily SwansonHuffington PostJanuary 30th, 2013Most Americans are opposed to allowing any scientist to attempt such a feat - with or without a human surrogate.
Neo Neanderthal[With CGS's Pete Shanks]by Alyona MinkovskiHuffPost LiveJanuary 25th, 2013A leading geneticist at Harvard Medical School says he can clone a Neanderthal and resurrect the extinct species. What are the ethical issues, risks and benefits?
George Church on Neanderthal Clones and Designer Babies by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJanuary 23rd, 2013George Church now says that he doesn't advocate cloning a Neanderthal with a human surrogate. Here's some context.
Wanted: Adventurous Surrogate to Gestate Neanderthal Baby [updated]by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJanuary 19th, 2013George Church speculates about an "adventurous female human" willing to be impregnated with a synthetically constructed and genetically engineered Neanderthal-like clone.
Interview with George Church: Can Neanderthals Be Brought Back from the Dead?by Philip Bethge and Johann GrolleDer SpiegelJanuary 18th, 2013The English translation of the interview in which George Church of Harvard University explains how genetic technology and synthetic biology might permit the creation of a Neanderthal-like clone that could be gestated by a woman.
"Adventurous Female Human" Needed to Give Birth to NeandertalGenome WebJanuary 17th, 2013Harvard's George Church on recreating Neandertals, engineering humans to live to 120, making people resistant to viruses, and exchanging DNA with other species.
A Rebuttal to Mark Lynas’ GMO Reversalby Jason MarkEarth Island JournalJanuary 11th, 2013Organic farmer, writer, and environmental policy advocate delves into Lynas' rationale for turning pro-GMO and finds scientific, environmental, economic, and social reasons not to agree.
Eric Hoffman on a Very Discreet Newcomer: Synthetic Biologyby Eric HoffmanA World of ScienceJanuary 11th, 2013An interview on the dangers of synthetic biology published in UNESCO's Natural Sciences Sector's quarterly journal.
Could Human Enhancement Turn Soldiers Into Weapons That Violate International Law? Yesby Patrick LinThe AtlanticJanuary 4th, 2013New technologies reveal ambiguities and hidden assumptions in international humanitarian law.
UK Government's Enthusiasm for GM Not Matched in Developing Nationsby John VidalThe Guardian January 4th, 2013Across the world, countries are turning their backs on GM crops; perhaps the coalition in the UK could learn something from them.
Biotech's 10 Biggest PR Disasters of 2012GMWatchDecember 31st, 20122012 was the year the lights came up on the biotech industry. Its claims, its tactics and its products all came under scrutiny and some of its biggest PR fairytales bit the dust. Here are some prime examples.
FDA Moves Closer to Approval of GMO Fish, Critics Outragedby Carey GillamReutersDecember 21st, 2012A controversial genetically engineered salmon has moved a step closer to the consumer's dining table after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said the fish didn't appear likely to pose a threat.
My Concerns About Nature Paper on Genome Transfer for Mitochondrial Diseaseby Paul KnoepflerKnoepfler Lab Stem Cell BlogDecember 20th, 2012Is this paper really a clinically relevant breakthrough for mitochondrial disease worthy of a Nature paper?
Public interest group calls on FDA to rule "nuclear genome transfer" unacceptable[Press statement]December 19th, 2012“Nuclear genome transfer” would mean uncontrolled human experimentation on future children and their offspring.
Review: Bioethics: All That Matters by Donna Dickensonby Gina Maranto, Biopolitical Times guest contributorDecember 13th, 2012This lively and accessible guide to the ethical implications of biotechnology asks how the field promotes or undermines social equality.
Mitochondria Replacement Would Forever Alter the Human Germline. Do You Want a Say? by Jessica CussinsBiopolitical TimesNovember 15th, 2012The Center for Genetics and Society has sent a letter strongly recommending against changing the United Kingdom law that – like those in dozens of other countries – prohibits procedures that would alter the genes we pass on to our children.
E.U. Patents on Transgenic Chimps Challengedby Kai KupferschmidtScience InsiderNovember 13th, 2012Animal rights activists in Germany are contesting three patents on genetically engineered chimpanzees granted this year by the European Patent Office.
Clones and Cloud Atlasby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesNovember 13th, 2012Of the many characters in Cloud Atlas that explore what it means to be human, the most eloquent is a genetically engineered clone.
The Eugenic Impulseby Nathaniel ComfortThe Chronicle of Higher EducationNovember 12th, 2012Medical geneticists are working on weeding out disease, but what counts as disease is murky and the slide from prevention to enhancement loses friction fast.
Of Yeast Genes and Tinker Toysby Abby Lippman, Biopolitical Times guest contributorOctober 31st, 2012A recently published paper sounds a serious warning to those who want to tinker around with human genes.
Genetic Breakthrough at OHSU[With CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Allison FrostOregon Public RadioOctober 29th, 2012Researchers in Oregon have created a viable human embryo by combining genetic material from two women's eggs, raising safety and ethical questions.
Advocating Human Germline Interventionsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesOctober 28th, 2012Scientists in Oregon have published a paper that explicitly challenges the legal and procedural system that forbids genetic experiments on future generations, but most reports miss the full implications of the announcement.
Human Genetic Modification Experiment in Oregon Shows Promise, Risks, Experts Say[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Nick BudnickThe OregonianOctober 24th, 2012Researchers have replaced unfertilized eggs' mitochondrial DNA, raising concerns about human germline modifications.
Geneticists Breach Ethical Taboo By Changing Genes Across Generations[With CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Rob SteinNPROctober 24th, 2012Geneticists reported Wednesday that they had crossed a threshold long considered off-limits: They have made changes in human DNA that can be passed down from one generation to the next.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Germline Engineeringby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesOctober 16th, 2012Japanese researchers have created mice by using sperm and eggs grown from induced pluripotent stem cells, a development that could bring human germline engineering much closer.
Genetically Engineering 'Ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation, Says Oxford Professor by Richard AlleyneThe Telegraph [UK]August 16th, 2012Bioethicist Julian Savulescu said that creating so-called designer babies could be considered a "moral obligation" as it makes them grow up into "ethically better children."
Synthetic 'Upgrade' for Fruit Fly's DNA by Linda GeddesNew ScientistAugust 13th, 2012The genetic code of the fruit fly Drosophila has been hacked into, allowing it to make proteins with properties that don't exist in the natural world.
23andMe Wants FDA Approval for Personal DNA Testing. What Can It Reveal?by Bonnie RochmanTIME HealthlandAugust 2nd, 2012The personal genomics company 23andMe announced that it is seeking FDA approval for its version of DNA testing.
Ethics Schmethics Says Ethicistby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJuly 19th, 2012The approach of the Olympics sparks the usual flood of pro-enhancement articles, notably an interview with Julian Savulescu.
Fetal Genome Blood Test: Lots of Issues, Scientists Sayby Rosie MestelLos Angeles TimesJuly 6th, 2012The ability to extract the fetal genome from the blood of the mother raises a plethora of new ethical concerns.
Designer Babies in Popular Cultureby Jessica CussinsBiopolitical TimesJune 21st, 2012The Whitest Kids U’Know’s comedic parody of genetic counseling is reminiscent of a similar scene in GATTACA.
Nuffield Council Gives Green Light to the Prevention of Inherited Mitochondrial Diseaseby Antony Blackburn-StarzaBioNewsJune 12th, 2012The UK-based Nuffield Council on Bioethics has declared that the benefits of new techniques which aim to prevent the transmission of faulty mtDNA from mother to child outweigh any risks.
Genetic Screening of Unborn Babies 'May be Inaccurate'by Nick CollinsThe Telegraph (UK)June 7th, 2012The blood test that may be used to routinely screen foetuses for more than 3,000 genetic conditions raises "many ethical questions" and is not a clear indicator of how severe a disability may be.
A New Technique for Human Genetic Modification?by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMay 1st, 2012Chinese scientists have developed a new way to reproduce genetically modified mice, and are already speculating about human applications.
Discussing Transhumanism on Al-Jazeeraby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesApril 5th, 2012Al Jazeera, the global TV and multimedia news organization, recently featured a discussion of transhumanism.
A Burst of Useful (Not Utilitarian) Bloggingby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesMarch 22nd, 2012Bioethicists' articles about the permissibility of infanticide and a pill for racism have been drawing a buzz of outrage.
SynBioWatch to Hold Public Discussion on Synthetic Biology Risksby Doug PetBiopolitical TimesMarch 16th, 2012A social and environmental justice coalition, SynbioWatch, will hold a public meeting to discuss the possible dangers associated with synthetic biology.
Bioengineer Humans to Tackle Climate Change, Say Philosophersby Leo HickmanGuardianMarch 14th, 2012The authors of a controversial recommendation say their critics have misunderstood the nature of philosophical inquiry.
Environmental Groups Call for Tighter Regulation of ‘Extreme Genetic Engineering’by Brian VastagWashington PostMarch 13th, 2012A global coalition of 111 organizations released the first global declaration outlining principles that must be adopted to protect the environment from risks posed by synthetic biology.
Worrying New Signs of Interest in Re-engineering Humansby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesFebruary 23rd, 2012Several academics and defense department employees are actively discussing the idea of engineering people, for warfare, to express social values and even to react to climate change.
Biopolitical Times Mourns the Passing of Charles WeinerBiopolitical TimesFebruary 7th, 2012History of science scholar Charles Weiner passed away January 28, 2012. We reflect on his contributions to the field.
'Three-Person IVF' Technique Moves CloserBBC NewsJanuary 19th, 2012Public opinion will help decide the future of a controversial genetic technique to stop serious conditions being passed from mother to child.
Synthetic Biology and the Rise of the 'Spider-Goats'by Adam RutherfordThe Guardian [UK]January 14th, 2012"Synthetic organisms at this point should not be out there in the environment; they shouldn't be out there in industry. That's irresponsible and inappropriate."
Eric Lander on Scientific Responsibilityby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesJanuary 9th, 2012Geneticist Eric Lander was the only scientist of anything like his level of prominence to publicly oppose the researchers campaigning for the development of "designer baby" technology.
Dystopian "In Time" and Inequalities in Our Timeby Emily BeitiksBiopolitical TimesDecember 1st, 2011The dystopian future of Andrew Niccol's new film, In Time, resonates with current inequalities.
Gene Therapy Can Protect Against HIVAn introduced gene conveys long-lived resistance to HIV infection in mice.by Lauren GravitzNature NewsNovember 30th, 2011An introduced gene conveys long-lived resistance to HIV infection in mice.
New Buzz around Biological Hazardsby Emily BeitiksBiopolical TimesNovember 1st, 2011Recent reports highlight emerging biological engineering risks that might not be all that different from threats of bioterrorism, though the context of development surely differs.
Lab Fight Raises U.S. Security Issuesby Jennifer GollanNew York TimesOctober 22nd, 2011Biosafety expert Paul Rabinow resigned from the UC Berkeley-led Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center, and asserted that the Center is not doing enough to prevent a biological disaster.
Gene therapy and stem cells uniteby James GallagherBBC NewsTwo of the holy grails of medicine - stem cell technology and precision gene therapy - have been united for the first time in humans, say scientists.
Which Came First the Chicken or the Dinosaur?...Think Againby Emily BeitiksBiopolical TimesOctober 12th, 2011Paleontologist John Horner wants to create a living dinosaur by “reverse evolving” the chicken.
Cats as Experimental Animals for Human Diseasesby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesSeptember 15th, 2011Genetically modified cats have been created, partly in the hopes of advancing AIDS research.
Glowing transgenic cats could boost AIDS research by Andy CoghlanNew ScientistSeptember 11th, 2011Scientists hope genetically modified cats will lead to similar approaches to protecting humans from infection with HIV.
Set a bug to kill a bugby Marian TurnerNature NewsAugust 16th, 2011Engineered bacteria that can detect and kill human pathogens could provide a new way to treat antibiotic-resistant bacteria, although researchers say they won't be injected into people any time soon.
CGS Summary of Public Opinion Pollsby CGS StaffJune 1st, 2011This page offers comparisons of survey results for three technologies: reproductive cloning, research cloning, and inheritable genetic modification.
Identical Twins Are Genetically Differentby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesApril 5th, 2011Researchers looking for a genetic basis for schizophrenia report that monozygotic twins, always assumed to be genetically identical, in fact have different DNA.
Gene of the Week: Christianityby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesApril 1st, 2011Gay scientists are reported to have isolate the 'Christian gene' and to have successfully removed it from experimental rats.
New film depicts a genetically engineered, anti-gay future by Doug PetBiopolitical TimesMarch 17th, 2011Nisha Ganatra’s Beholder depicts a future in which children are genetically designed and homosexuality is screened out of the population.
Babies with THREE parents and free of genetic disease could soon be born using controversial IVF technique[United Kingdom]by David DerbyshireThe Daily MailMarch 12th, 2011But the new IVF technique raises questions and concerns.
Animal death toll ends cloning trials [New Zealand]by Kiran ChugThe Dominion PostFebruary 21st, 2011Although cloning trials will no longer be conducted, AgResearch will continue to develop transgenic cattle, sheep and goats.
Top IVF doctor defends offering help for parents to pick babies' sexby Lisa AdamsDaily RecordJuly 29th, 2010MEET the doctor who is making Scots' dreams of designing the perfect baby come true.
How Far Would You Go? Public Interest Collaborative Announces First-Ever Web Series for Parents on Technologies that Could Alter Human NatureMother’s Day launch to spark grassroots discussions about new reproductive and genetic technologiesMay 5th, 2010A new website and series of short videos on the complex challenges of new reproductive and genetic technologies.
BioConversations: Taking the Biotech Discussion Public by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 5th, 2010Introducing the first web series for parents about technologies that could alter human nature.
Emerging Technologies and a Sustainable, Healthy, Just WorldThe Case of Human Reproductive and Genetic Technologiesby Marcy Darnovsky and Jesse ReynoldsBiodiversity: The Newsletter of the Consultative Group on Biological Diversity (Winter 2010)Environmentalists are in a position to play a critically important role in determining how powerful, emerging technologies are ultimately developed, used, and regulated.
Technology Updates: Inheritable Genetic Modificationby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJanuary 14th, 2010Two new technologies may make inheritable genetic modification significantly more feasible.
Return of the GenRich?by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesOctober 29th, 2009There has been a brief flurry of discussion about future separate species of humans.
Monkeys, Mitochondria, and the Human Germline by Jesse ReynoldsBioethics ForumSeptember 18th, 2009The researchers into radically novel techniques display an alarmingly casual attitude toward risks to the potential children born, the difficulties and dangers of obtaining the large numbers of the required women's eggs, and the potentially dire social consequences of human inheritable genetic modification.
Michael Sandel on genetics, morality, and a new politics of the common goodby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesSeptember 11th, 2009"It is tempting to think that bioengineering our children and ourselves for success in a competitive society is an exercise of freedom. But changing our nature to fit the world, rather than the other way around, is actually the deepest form of disempowerment."
New Genetic Therapy [includes audio]by Oregon Public BroadcastingThink Out LoudSeptember 1st, 2009CGS's Marcy Darnovsky and researcher Shoukhrat Mitolipov debate the implications of a new study about mitochondrial DNA for inheritable genetic modification on this call-in radio show.
Live mice and sperm - both from stem cells - create new social and ethical challengesPublic interest group calls for federal oversight of reproductive usesJuly 26th, 2009Recent developments in cell reprogramming methods raise significant new ethical and social challenges.
Other uses for laboratory-produced sperm?by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJuly 13th, 2009Advances in laboratory-produced sperm--if perfected--could also be used for other purposes, including troubling ones.
Monkey see, monkey glow[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Tom AbateGlobal PostJune 2nd, 2009Altered primates bring inherited genetic modification closer to humans.
Modified Marmoset in the Mediaby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 29th, 2009American media coverage of genetically modified primates was remarkably thin, and few articles mentioned social and ethical implications
Glowing Green Monkeys Illustrate Important but Controversial Advanceby Rob SteinWashington PostMay 28th, 2009Scientists have created the first genetically modified monkeys that can pass their new genetic attributes to their offspring
Public interest group urges caution in response to genetically modified primatesCenter for Genetics and Society calls for scientists, policymakers to reject human inheritable genetic modificationMay 27th, 2009The Center for Genetics and Society today said that the creation of a transgenic marmoset underlines the need for scientists and policy makers to reject human inheritable genetic modification.
Libertarians Diss Democracyby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesMay 14th, 2009Transhumanists put their disdain for democracy in writing.
Fluorescent puppy is world's first transgenic dog by Ewen CallawayNew ScientistApril 23rd, 2009Five beagles who produce a fluorescent protein are the world's first transgenic dogs.
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill 2008A Commentaryby David KingApril 15th, 2009The director of Human Genetics Alert offers an analysis of the UK's new law governing human genetic and reproductive technologies.
There's no success like failure ...by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesFebruary 6th, 2009Another attempt to clone an extinct species has failed, but been widely hailed as a success. Many more have been and are being considered.
From cellular reprogramming to human genetic modificationby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesJanuary 30th, 2009While reprogrammed iPS cells may resolve quandaries about embryo destruction, they could also be a path towards human genetic modification
Designer Babies: Ethical? Inevitable?Quotes CGS's Richard Hayesby Robert Roy Britt, Editorial DirectorLiveScienceJanuary 11th, 2009
Breast cancer gene-free baby born BBCJanuary 9th, 2009The first baby in the UK tested before conception for a genetic form of breast cancer has been born.
Appleyard on H+by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesOctober 22nd, 2008Brian Appleyard weighs in on "risible" transhumanists.
H+ ≈ Humanity+ ≈ Humanity Plus ≈ WTA ≈ Extropy (etc.)by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesOctober 20th, 2008The relaunch of the World Transhumanist Association, now Humanity Plus, stumbles on, with the launch of H+ Magazine.
Hank Greely on CGS and Human Genetic Modificationby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesSeptember 19th, 2008While Stanford bioethicist Hank Greeley denies being "enthusiastic" about human genetic modification, he's certainly opposed to prohibitions on it or on reproductive cloning.
Inequality and Human Genetics[Letter to the editor]by Richard HayesThe New York TimesSeptember 16th, 2008The genetic modification of our children is a practice that conservatives and liberals alike should be able to agree poses far more risks than benefits, and should be taken off the table as an option.
Neo-con logic: Designer babies for all by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesSeptember 10th, 2008A neo-conservative pundit endorses inheritable genetic enhancement.
All in the Genesby Marcy Darnovsky and Hank GreelyDemocracyAugust 31st, 2008A letter exchange between CGS's Marcy Dranovsky and bioethicist Hank Greely of Stanford University in the Fall 2008 edition of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas.
Happy Birthday!by Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesJuly 25th, 2008Louise Brown's 30th birthday is also the 30th anniversary of the start of the modern assisted reproduction industry.
Germline Modification Carries Risk of Major Social Harm by Marcy DarnovskyNatureJune 4th, 2008In this letter to the editor, CGS's Darnovsky points out that when discussing the potential to derive gametes from stem cells, we must be willing to draw lines proscribing socially pernicious applications.
Center for American Progress on GM Embryosby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 29th, 2008Sirine Shebaya at the Center for American Progress's Science Progress blog commented on the recent disclosure of the first genetically modified human embryos.
UK Scientists to Combine Human, Animal Embryos[Interviews CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]CNN Headline NewsMay 21st, 2008CNN's Glenn Beck on cybrids.
Crossing An Ethical Boundaryby Marcy DarnovskyThe Journal of Life SciencesMay 19th, 2008When scientists fail to appreciate public concerns they can easily undermine public trust.
US group questions human embryo research, calls for rules[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]Deutsche Presse-AgenturMay 14th, 2008The Center for Genetics and Society calls for national bioethics standards and regulations after scientists produced a genetically-engineered embryo.
U.S. Researchers Create Genetically Modified Human EmbryoGenetic CrossroadsMay 14th, 2008A U.S. research group has created what appears to be the world's first genetically modified human embryo, crossing an ethical boundary that until now has been observed by scientists around the world.
Media Coverage of Genetically Modified Embryosby Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMay 13th, 2008Here is a roundup of some of the media coverage from the weekend's revelation that scientists have created a genetically modified human embryo.
Engineering by Scientists on Embryo Stirs Criticism[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Andrew PollackNew York TimesMay 13th, 2008Researchers in New York have created what is believed to be the first genetically engineered human embryo, which critics immediately branded as a step toward “designer babies.”
Genetically modified human embryo stirs criticism[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Malcolm RitterAssociated PressMay 12th, 2008News that scientists have for the first time genetically altered a human embryo is drawing fire from some watchdog groups that say it's a step toward creating "designer babies."
Public interest group criticizes creation of first genetically modified human embryo Center for Genetics and Society calls for effective regulationMay 12th, 2008A small group of researchers decided on its own to overstep a key ethical boundary that has been observed around the world, with no discussion by the public, the media, or policy makers.
Scientist team creates first GM human embryoby Sarah-Kate TempletonThe Times (UK)May 11th, 2008Scientists from Cornell University in New York have created what is believed to be the first genetically modified (GM) human embryo.
CGS debates libertarian bioethicist Ronald Greenby Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesApril 14th, 2008Countering advocacy of a designer-baby future in the Washington Post and on Talk of the Nation.
Immortality breakthrough! Read all about it!by Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesApril 14th, 2008A transhumanist shares the secrets of "longevity escape velocity."
Brave New World Warby Jamie MetzlDemocracyMarch 21st, 2008Genetic engineering will soon turn science fiction to fact. Here's why we need a new global treaty to control it.
Embryos created with DNA from 3 peopleby Maria ChengAssociated PressFebruary 5th, 2008British scientists say they have created human embryos containing DNA from two women and a man in a procedure that researchers hope might be used one day to produce embryos free of inherited diseases.
When You Play With Dirt, You Get Dirty by Osagie ObasogieBiopolitical TimesDecember 13th, 2007Slate’s Will Saletan has backed himself into a corner by coming to the defense of James Watson – the eccentric DNA pioneer who found himself pontificating on how Blacks’ separate evolutionary patterns conferred certain genes that depress their intellects.
James Watson Retires After Racial Remarksby Cornelia DeanNew York TimesOctober 25th, 2007James D. Watson, the eminent biologist who ignited an uproar last week with remarks about the intelligence of people of African descent, retired today as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island and from its board.
Watson's Worldby Jesse ReynoldsOctober 24th, 2007James Watson's worldview is not simply racist; he's promoting full-tilt eugenics.
Still Unnoticed: James Watson’s Eugenic EnthusiasmsOctober 22nd, 2007No media accounts so far have cited James Watson's active and explicit support for a new program of eugenics, based not on outmoded scientific theories but on twenty-first century genetic and reproductive technologies.
Watson as wake-up call: When genetics endorses a new eugenicsby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesOctober 22nd, 2007Though neither media nor blogosphere have noted it so far, Watson and a small but disturbing number of other prominent figures are actively promoting a renewed program of eugenics - this time using 21st-century reproductive and genetic technologies.
James Watson's LegacyReviving Bigotry and Eugenicsby Center for Genetics and SocietyBiopolitical TimesOctober 22nd, 2007James Watson on eugenics, genetic modification, race, intelligence, sex, and more
Nobel Notions and the Uses of Geneticsby Marcy DarnovskyAlternetOctober 19th, 2007It's Nobel Prize season, and Nobel scientists are very much in the news. James Watson is currently embroiled in controversy after making a series of blatantly racist remarks. But related views espoused by one of this year's laureates have gone unnoticed.
Enhancing the speciesby Anjana AhujaThe Times (UK)October 10th, 2007Philosopher John Harris argues that we have a moral and ethical duty to improve the human race by biologically enhancing our children.
The Nobel Prize and the New Eugenicsby Marcy DarnovskyBiopolitical TimesOctober 9th, 2007Not mentioned in the award announcement or media coverage of it are new Nobelist Mario Capecchi’s views on the future use of these techniques to produce transgenic human beings. In short, Capecchi is on record embracing the idea.
Birth Without the Bother?by Nicholas D. KristofNew York TimesJuly 23rd, 2007"So where do we regulate and draw the line? My vote is to allow genetic technologies aimed at combating disease or infertility, but to bar any effort that goes beyond the curative to enhance the germ line DNA of our offspring."
Marquette professor looks at growing debate of using technology to enhance humansby Mark JohnsonMilwaukee Journal SentinelMay 9th, 2007"Many of these new technologies are very powerful and will allow us to manipulate the natural world in ways that we've never seen before," said Richard Hayes.
"Should the possibility of inadvertent gene transfer to the germline be considered a benefit or risk?"by Jesse ReynoldsBiopolitical TimesMarch 21st, 2007Researchers in the UK are working towards gene "therapy" on human fetuses.
UK Campaign to Stop Genetically Modified Human Embryosby Marcy DarnovskyGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 28th, 2007The UK-based Human Genetics Alert (HGA) has launched a campaign to prevent Britain from becoming the first country in the world to sanction the production of genetically modified human embryos.
Dawn of the GM babies? [UK]thisislondon.co.ukFebruary 24th, 2007Scientists will be able to carry out genetic experiments on human embryos for the first time under controversial UK Government plans.
Important Changes in UK Law on Reproductive and Genetic Technologiesby David KingGenetic CrossroadsJanuary 26th, 2007Dr. David King gives his views on government proposals that would reorganize the UK HFEA and set important new rules.
'Embryo bank': new hope or too far?[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]by Amanda PaulsonChristian Science MonitorJanuary 18th, 2007"A Texas fertility center's methods raise concerns about 'designing'babies. Some say they're not much different from the usual practice."
'Mortal Combat' and Biotechnologyby Parita ShahBiopolitical TimesNovember 14th, 2006Check out Will Saletan's latest article in Slate, Mortal Combat: The Exploding Politics of Biotechnology.
The costly appliance of scienceby Peter SingerThe GuardianSeptember 14th, 2006"The advance of knowledge is often a mixed blessing. Over the past 60 years, nuclear physics has been one obvious example of this truth. Over the next 60 years, genetics may be another. "
Transhumanism: Yearning to transcend biologyby Cathy YoungBoston GlobeJuly 10th, 2006"With everything else that's happening in the world today, debates about whether humanity should embrace as yet nonexistent technologies that could enhance our physical and intellectual abilities and someday make us "more than human" may seem frivolous."
Among the TranshumanistsCyborgs, self-mutilators, and the future of our raceby William SaletanSlateJune 4th, 2006William Saletan reports on the Transhumanist conference, "Human Enhancement Technologies," at Stanford University.
Opening Comments at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) consultation on Human Enhancementby Richard HayesJune 1st, 2006
Inheritable Genetic Modification Frequently Asked Questions Answers to common questions concerning inheritable genetic modification
Is there a human right to be superhuman?by Brian AlexanderMSNBCJune 1st, 2006"Transhumanism is being taken seriously by an increasing number of scholars."
Inheritable Genetic Modification Arguments Pro and ConSummary of the arguments for and against inheritable genetic modification as well as rebuttals to each side
Inheritable Genetic Modification Basic ScienceA basic explanation of the science behind genetic modification.
Stem Cell Cautionby Richard HayesTom PaineMay 24th, 2006"I'm worried because in their over-the-top enthusiasm for stem cell and cloning research, Democrats are ignoring the many ways in which it could, if irresponsibly promoted and inadequately regulated, have consequences at odds with core Democratic values."
Smarter than thou? Stanford conference ponders a brave new world with machines more powerful than their creators[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by Tom AbateSan Francisco ChronicleMay 12th, 2006"Although little known outside technological circles, transhumanism inspires intense opposition from ethical watchdog groups that dispute the notion that such technological tweaking would represent progress."
The World Economic Forum addresses human biotechnologiesGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 23rd, 2006George Annas writes about governing the emerging human biotechnologies in Global Agenda, the official publication of the World Economic Forum. Annas is chair of the Health Law Department at the Boston University School of Public Health and co-founder of Global Lawyers & Physicians.
Governing Biotechnologyby George AnnasGlobal Agenda MagazineFebruary 13th, 2006"Developments in biotechnology have made possible species-changing and even species-endangering procedures, says George Annas. We urgently need a global governance structure to regulate them."
There is no stop button in the race for human re-engineeringby Madeleine BuntingThe GuardianJanuary 30th, 2006"There's no stop button available. Much of the research that could be ultimately used for human enhancement is urgently needed to counter such neuro-degenerative diseases as Alzheimer's. "
UNESCO Declarations on Bioethics and Human Rights The UNESCO Bioethics Programme has sponsored three nonbinding international agreements.
Jose Canseco and Human Genetic EngineeringWill He Be Right Again?by Osagie ObasogieCincinnati EnquirerOctober 21st, 2005Canseco argued that gene doping "is definitely the next big step in evolution." Genetic enhancement, he said, "goes way beyond sports."
Of baseball and enhancement bondageby Pete ShanksSan Francisco ChronicleSeptember 26th, 2005Pete Shanks says that the debate over drugs in sports is a precursor to more profound questions of science and human 'enhancement.'
Scientists guilty of 'hyping' benefits of gene researchThe Independent (UK)September 5th, 2005"The leading fertility scientist Lord Winston has hit out at senior scientists, including two Nobel laureates, for making exaggerated claims about the supposed benefits of scientific research, warning they could trigger a public backlash."
Roberts v. the Future: Genetic Screening and the Future of Personal AutonomyNew York TimesAugust 28th, 2005This excerpt examines how John Roberts may, as a US Supreme Court justice, rule on human reproductive cloning and sex selection.
Geneticists Getting Close to Engineering Good Looksby Lee DyeABC NewsJune 1st, 2005"Underregulated Attempts to Tinker With Human Germline Genetics Could Change Generations to Come"
Of mighty mice & super menby Michael DobieNew York NewsdayMarch 20th, 2005An extensive, well-researched article on the emerging likelihood of "genetic doping" in sports
[UK] MPs say lift ban on reproductive human cloningThe ObserverMarch 20th, 2005A report from a committee of the UK House of Commons will recommend that human genetic modification, reproductive cloning, sex selection for social purposes, and human-animal chimeras should be permitted.
Human genetic changes nearerby Fred ReedWashington TimesFebruary 24th, 2005Sometimes the most important clouds on the technological horizon don't get much ink. One of these is the "genetic engineering" of people, usually suggested as a means of making the species more intelligent.
Homo Respect-us: The creature genetic engineers fear most[Quotes CGS's Richard Hayes]by William SaletanSlateDecember 17th, 2004Slate's William Saletan reports on a meeting to discuss the potential for human inheritable genetic modificiation, at which some scientists and ethicists "flirted" with moving forward, and mocked concerns.
Technology Allows Choice Embryo Screening Stirs Ethics Debateby Rob SteinWashington PostDecember 14th, 2004A long front-page article explores the growing use of sex selection for social reasons in the US
New Zealand LegislationGenetic CrossroadsDecember 2nd, 2004
Michael Cook: Where are the ethics in brazen bioethics?by Michael CookThe AgeNovember 22nd, 2004Michael Cook, the editor of BioEdge, an email newsletter on bioethics, asserts that many leading bioethicists - especially Julian Savulescu - lack the strong qualifications necessary to guide policy.
'Designer babies' bill through after eight years (New Zealand)stuff.co.nzNovember 11th, 2004New Zealand's Human Assisted Reproductive Technology was strongly supported in its third reading. Its original author laments that it has been weakened during its years of debate, although she still supports the bill.
Sperm Stem Cells Are Grown Outside Bodyby Nicholas WadeNew York TimesNovember 4th, 2004"In a step that brings closer the possibility of making inheritable genetic changes in humans, scientists have succeeded in growing outside the body the special stem cells that direct the remarkably prolific process of sperm production."
The End Runby William Dean HintonSilicon Valley/Santa Cruz MetroOctober 27th, 2004A coalition of South Bay activists stands poised to topple President Bush's go-slow stem cell policy
Debe prevalecer la bioética en investigación científicaDe lo contrario, estaríamos ante grave peligro, alertanby Soledad Jarquin EdgarCimac NoticiasOctober 25th, 2004La bioética debe prevalecer ante el avance de las investigaciones científicas con seres humanos, porque el riesgo es ensanchar aún más las desigualdades entre los pobres y los ricos, coincidieron en señalar investigadoras de Brasil y Estados Unidos.
Babies with three parents aheadby Antony Barnett and Robin McKieThe ObserverOctober 17th, 2004UK "Scientists are seeking permission to carry out experiments that would result in children being born with three biological parents." Approval by the HFEA is likely.
Experts Warn of Moral Crisis From Genetic Scienceby Leonie ShermanNorth Gate News OnlineOctober 11th, 2004Marcy Darnovsky and Bill McKibben told an audience at UC Berkeley last night that human capability to design children is not a distant dream but a coming reality that presents moral challenges American society is not yet prepared to deal with.
Discussing the ethics of altering human genesby Charles BurressSan Francisco ChronicleSeptember 30th, 2004At an event sponsored by the UC Berkeley Knight Program in Science and Environmental Journalism, CGS's Marcy Darnovsky and author Bill McKibben spoke to an overflow crowd about the challenges of the new human genetic technologies and California's Prop 71.
Rush for designer babiesby Nick PappsThe Sunday Mail (Australia)September 5th, 2004"Hundereds of Australian couples are avoiding the law and buying designer babies in the United States_. While Australian women are selling their eggs for up to $20,000 a 'harvest.'"
Building Better Bodiesby Nicholas D. KristofThe New York TimesAugust 25th, 2004
GE babies banned - problems remain with HART bill (New Zealand)ScoopAugust 6th, 2004New Zealand's Green Party has reservations about the proposed regulatory structure for human genetic technologies.
Challenges of Emerging Technologies: Reproductive Cloning and Inheritable Genetic Modificationby Marcy DarnovskyMay 7th, 2004Presentation at "Gender and Justice in the Gene Age," New York, NY
CGS NEWSGenetic CrossroadsApril 9th, 2004
Breaking the policy deadlock on cloning and assisted reproduction by Richard HayesSan Francisco ChronicleApril 4th, 2004
Posthuman Enough?by Richard B. NorgaardBioScienceMarch 30th, 2004Will we say "enough" and set up the controls necessary to prevent the transformation of a portion of the human population into superpeople?
Road to Cloning: Caution Aheadby Judy NorsigianNew York TimesFebruary 17th, 2004
Selective Scienceby Richard HayesTomPaine.comFebruary 12th, 2004
NGO for UN life sciences technology evaluation bodyby Gireesh Chandra Prasad Express Pharma PulseJanuary 24th, 2004
Should We Improve Our Genome?by Nicholas WadeThe New York TimesNovember 11th, 2003
Cloning and Germline Intervention: U.S. Perspectives Perspectives on Reproductive Technologies and Biomedicineby Marcy DarnovskyOctober 13th, 2003Presentation at "Within and Beyond Human Nature," Berlin, Germany
Breeding Only the Bestby Tony PlattLos Angeles TimesSeptember 7th, 2003
Happy birthday, LouiseThere's a Line To Be Drawn -- Before we Get to `Enhanced'by Pete ShanksSan Jose Mercury NewsJuly 24th, 2003
Science and Society: Time to act on biotech's human repercussionsby Pete ShanksSan Francisco ChronicleJuly 23rd, 2003
The New Eugenicsby Nicholas D. KristofNew York TimesJuly 4th, 2003One of the most profound and layered questions raised by recent genetic advances is this: Do we as a species still want babies born with genetic disabilities?
21st Century Eugenicsby Jesse ReynoldsTomPaine.comJune 26th, 2003
Ooplasmic TransferMay 30th, 2003Ooplasmic transfer is an experimental fertility technique that involves injecting a small amount of cytoplasm from eggs of fertile women into eggs of women whose fertility is compromised. The modified egg is then fertilized with sperm and implanted in the uterus of the woman attempting to achieve pregnancy.
James Watson Wants to Build a Better Humanby Ralph BraveAlterNet.orgMay 28th, 2003Did you have a nice DNA Day? And how was your Human Genome Month? If you missed those Congressionally-designated celebrations last month due to minor distractions, like a war or being laid off from your job, don't worry: The media missed the real story anyway.
Too Clever Too Fast Too Happyby Bill McKibbenThe GuardianMay 3rd, 2003But what if, instead of crudely cheating with hypodermics, we began literally to programme children before they were born to become great athletes?... And as we move into the new world of genetic engineering, we won't simply lose races, we'll lose racing : we'll lose the possibility of the test, the challenge, the celebration that athletics represents.
Designer Genesby Bill McKibbenOrionApril 30th, 2003Once you accept the idea that our bodies are essentially plastic, and that it's okay to manipulate that plastic, there's no reason to think that consumers would balk because "genes" were involved instead of, say, "toxins." Especially since genetic engineering would not promote your own vanity, but instead be sold as a boon to your child. The vision of genetic engineers is to do to humans what we have already done to salmon and wheat, pine trees and tomatoes.
Watson's Worldby Susan LindeeScienceApril 18th, 2003
Keep Us Human: If We're Truly Smart, We'll Refuse to Foolishly Tamper with Our DNAby Bill McKibbenLos Angeles TimesApril 14th, 2003
Germline Warfareby Ralph BraveThe NationApril 7th, 2003Bill McKibben's "Enough" is reviewed by Ralph Brave at The Nation.
Human Biotechnology: Responding to Emerging Dangerous New Human Geneticsby Jesse ReynoldsZ MagazineMarch 31st, 2003
“Do We Want Science to Reinvent Human Aging?”by Bill McKibben and Gregory StockTranscript of live debateMarch 27th, 2003
The Threshold Challenge of the New Human Genetic TechnologiesMarch 1st, 2003We are fast approaching arguably the most consequential technological threshold in all of human history: the ability to alter the genes we pass to our children.
Human Cloning and Genetic TechnologyThe Global Challenge to Social Justice, Human Rights and the EnvironmentFebruary 25th, 2003The Heinrich Böll Foundation, the Center for Genetics and Society, and the Worldwatch Institute presented a briefing and discussion in Washington.
The Weapons of Mass CreationAre we ready for genetically enhanced 'designer people'? If so, who will make the titanic decisions involved?by Caroline S. WagnerLos Angleles TimesFebruary 13th, 2003
A Threat to Our Coherent Human Futureby Bill McKibbenWashington PostJanuary 5th, 2003
NEW ADVOCACY OF INHERITABLE GENETIC MODIFICATION (IGM)Genetic CrossroadsDecember 17th, 2002
Averting the clone age [PDF]Prospects and perils of human developmental manipulationby Stuart NewmanJournal of Contemporary Health Law and PolicyNovember 30th, 2002
Excerpts from Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age by Bill McKibbenNovember 30th, 2002
The New Eugenicsby Jesse ReynoldsZ MagazineOctober 31st, 2002
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer Calls for International Accord on Human GeneticsGenetic CrossroadsOctober 25th, 2002
UN Treaty to Ban Human Reproductive CloningGenetic CrossroadsSeptember 18th, 2002
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Tripby Gina Maranto New York TimesAugust 28th, 2002
The Science and Politics of Genetically Modified Humansby Richard HayesWorldwatchJuly 1st, 2002Will new genetic technologies be carefully controlled for their benefits—or will they inadvertently destroy civil society? Say hello to the post-human ideology.
Why Environmentalists Should Be Concernedby Bill McKibbenWorldWatchJune 30th, 2002Humans have dangerously destabilized the Earth's ecological system. If we now begin altering our evolved interdependence with nature, we will only accelerate the destabilization.
Embryo Cloning and Beyondby Marcy DarnovskyTikkunJune 30th, 2002
The New Eugenicsby Michael DorseyWorld WatchJune 30th, 2002
WHO report sanctions genetic enhancement and inheritable genetic modificationGenetic CrossroadsJune 12th, 2002
FDA acknowledges dangers of "de facto germline gene transfer" in fertility treatmentGenetic CrossroadsJune 12th, 2002
Towards a Global Bioethic?Prepared for the Franco-German Forum, Federal Foreign Office, Berlin,by Herr Joschka FischerJune 3rd, 2002
Call for Re-think on EugenicsBBC NewsApril 26th, 2002
The Body Shopby Ralph BraveThe NationApril 22nd, 2002Ralph Brave discusses cloning-based stem cell research and other human biotechnologies in this review of "Our Posthuman Future" by Francis Fukuyama.
In Utero Somatic Gene Transfer ProposalsMarch 15th, 2002In 1990 W. French Anderson became the first person to attempt authorized somatic gene transfer experiments on humans. In 1998 he proposed to begin in utero somatic gene transfer experiments and in the process, in his words, "push the envelope" on inheritable genetic modification.
Designer Babies: Human cloning is a long way off, but bioengineered kids are already here. by Shannon BrownleeThe Washington MonthlyFebruary 28th, 2002
Jack or Jill? The Era of Consumer-Driven Eugenics Has Begunby Margaret TalbotThe Atlantic MonthlyFebruary 28th, 2002
Governing the Genomeby Ralph BraveThe NationDecember 10th, 2001Formulating a progressive position on governing the genome--one that defends basic scientific research, prevents the misuse of genetic technology and upholds the right of individuals to genetic justice and genetic privacy--will be difficult.
EVENTS AND RESOURCESGenetic CrossroadsAugust 18th, 2001
Human Germline Manipuation and Cloning as Women's Issuesby Marcy DarnovskyGeneWatchJune 30th, 2001
A Real "Brave New World"What Human Genetic Engineers Plan for Your Futureby Mark Gabrish ConlanZenger's NewsmagazineJune 27th, 2001Opponents of human genetic engineering spoke forcefully at a workshop at San Diego City College June 24 as part of the Biojustice/Beyond Biodevastation V event.
David King on the Genome AnnouncementGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 21st, 2001
E Magazine Cover Story: "Designing People"Genetic CrossroadsJanuary 7th, 2001
Two New Techniques Developed for Producing "Designer Sperm"Genetic CrossroadsJanuary 7th, 2001
New Push for In Utero Gene TransferGenetic CrossroadsDecember 7th, 2000
The Case Against Designer BabiesThe Politics of Genetic Enhancementby Marcy DarnovskyRedesigning Life? The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering, edited by Brian Tokar, New York: Zed Books, 2001November 30th, 2000
The Quiet Campaign for Genetically Engineered Humansby Richard HayesEarth Island Journal, Spring 2001
Scientists, Activists, and Biotech Execs Debate Human Genetic Modification at State of the World ForumGenetic CrossroadsOctober 16th, 2000
News Stories about Tinkering with DNA Miss the Big PictureGlowing Rabbit Shows We're Creeping Toward Redesigning Human Lifeby Tom Abate San Francisco ChronicleSeptember 25th, 2000
AAAS RELEASES REPORT ON HUMAN GERMLINE ENGINEERINGGenetic CrossroadsSeptember 19th, 2000
Collins and Venter on Human Germline EngineeringGenetic CrossroadsAugust 4th, 2000
Stuart Newman on the Hazards of Developmental Gene ModificationGenetic CrossroadsAugust 4th, 2000
Building Better Humansby Ralph BraveSalonJune 27th, 2000The sci-fi possibilities of genetic tampering may soon become real. And there's no law against them.
Unnatural Selectionby Ralph BraveBaltimore City PaperJune 21st, 2000Will unlocking the human genome create an evolution revolution?
Designing Baby: Scientists on Verge of Manipulating Human DNAby Daniel Q. HaneyAssociated PressMay 5th, 2000
Computer scientist Bill Joy warns of dangers posed by genetic engineering, nanotechnolgoy, and roboticsGenetic CrossroadsApril 16th, 2000
Conference on "Extended Life / Eternal Life"Genetic CrossroadsApril 16th, 2000
New book by Gregory Stock and John Campbell promotes human germline engineeringGenetic CrossroadsApril 16th, 2000
Say "No" To Germline EngineeringAn open letter to participants at the Asilomar Symposium on Science, Ethics and SocietyGenetic CrossroadsFebruary 16th, 2000
New Scientist: "The Last Taboo"Genetic CrossroadsFebruary 4th, 2000
February 21 AAAS Symposium: "Changing Our Genetic Future Through Germline Intervention" (Washington DC)Genetic CrossroadsDecember 26th, 1999
OTHER NEWS AND POINTERSGenetic CrossroadsDecember 26th, 1999
The New Eugenics: The Case Against Genetically Modified Humansby Marcy DarnovskyDifferent Takes (Spring 2000)
Developments in research on artificial chromosomesGenetic CrossroadsNovember 21st, 1999
Bioethicist Arthur Caplan predicts designer babiesGenetic CrossroadsNovember 21st, 1999
ASILOMAR 2Genetic CrossroadsOctober 4th, 1999
Interview with Richard Hayes by Casey WalkerHuman Genetic Engineeringby Casey WalkerWild Duck ReviewMay 31st, 1999
Human germline gene modification: a dissent. (Viewpoint)by Paul R Billings; Ruth Hubbard; Stuart A. NewmanThe LancetMay 29th, 1999
SuperhumansLike it or not, in a few short years we'll have the power to control our own evolutionby Robert Taylor New ScientistOctober 1st, 1998
Germline Gene Therapy Contemplatedby Jeffrey FoxNature BiotechnologyMay 1st, 1998
Problems of Germline Therapyby Anne McLaren and Jonathan EwbankNatureApril 16th, 1998
Scientists Attempt to Patent "Designer Sperm"ReutersApril 13th, 1994
Designer Peopleby Sally DeneenE MagazineThe Human Genetic Blueprint Has Been Drafted, Offering Both Perils and Opportunities for the Environment. The Big Question: Are We Changing the Nature of Nature?
Protecting the Endangered Human [PDF]Toward an International Treaty Prohibiting Cloning and Inheritable Alterationsby George Annas, Lori Andrews, and Rosario IsasiAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 28 (2002):151-178

ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.665.7760 • (F) 1.510.665.8760