Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

About Human Rights & Human Biotechnology


Claims to universal human rights depend, in part, on formal recognition of our common humanity. Many countries use human rights as a broad framework to think about regulatory options for human biotechnologies. International declarations also commonly use this framework. Examples include the Council of Europe's Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and UNESCO's Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights.

The Convention on Biomedicine and Human Rights, like a number of other international agreements and declarations, rejects biotechnology applications that would alter the genomes of future generations. Manipulating genes in a manner that encodes inequality into our genes could easily unravel centuries of progress toward respecting human worth.



The "Medical" Justification for Re-creating Neanderthalsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesFebruary 16th, 2010"Should We Clone Neanderthals?" asks an article in Archaeology magazine.
Should We Clone Neanderthals? The scientific, legal, and ethical obstaclesby Zach ZorichArchaeology (March/April 2010)There are still technical obstacles, but soon it could be possible to use that long-extinct genome to safely create a healthy, living Neanderthal clone. Should it be done?
Judge allows DNA sampling for felony arresteesby Bob EgelkoSan Francisco ChronicleDecember 24th, 2009A federal judge refused to block a voter-approved California law requiring anyone arrested on a felony charge to provide DNA samples.
Genes and Jobs: U of Akron Tests the Testing Lawsby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesNovember 4th, 2009The University of Akron (UA) has a policy that could require any candidate for employment to submit a DNA sample, despite the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act.
ACLU Challenges California Prop. 69 by Osagie K. ObasogieBiopolitical TimesOctober 16th, 2009Prop. 69’s arrestee provision marks a radical expansion of the government’s power to indefinitely retain intimate information about citizens – many of whom may have done nothing more than be accused of committing a crime.
The Gray Areas at the Edges of Regulationby Pete ShanksBiopolitical TimesAugust 26th, 2009The UK experience with regulation continues to offer lessons, as sperm sellers are arrested, US companies promote sex selection to Britons, and an MP has his DNA removed from the police database.
DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show by Andrew PollackNew York TimesAugust 17th, 2009With fabricated blood or saliva, “you can just engineer a crime scene,” said the lead author of a new study.
Next Steps for Progressive Stem Cell Politicsby Marcy DarnovskyScience ProgressDecember 16th, 2008In the wake of the Bush administration’s policies, we will have the political space to craft a pro-research stand that simultaneously highlights the need for consistent and enforceable regulation, for hope without hype, and for developing human biotechnologies according to principles of social justice and human rights.
New Rule Expands DNA Collection to All People Arrestedby Spencer S. HsuThe Washington PostDecember 12th, 2008Immigration and civil liberties groups condemned a new U.S. government policy to collect DNA samples from all noncitizens detained by authorities and all people arrested for federal crimes.
European Court Rules Against British DNA Databaseby Sarah LyallThe New York TimesDecember 4th, 2008The European Court of Human Rights ruled unanimously on Thursday that Britain's policy of gathering and storing the fingerprints and DNA of all criminal suspects was a violation of the human right to privacy.
Displaying 1-10 of 35  
Next >> 
Last Page » 
« Show Complete List » 


ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.625.0819 • (F) 1.510.625.0874