<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>CGS</title>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/</link>
    <description>The Center for Genetics and Society
works for thoughtful consideration, responsible uses, and effective
governance of genetic, reproductive, and other biotechnologies.</description>
  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5282</link>
    <title>Patent Happenings</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The pace of news on legal challenges to patents on human genes is quickening.
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5282</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5275</link>
    <title>AMA meeting: Patents should not be issued for human genes</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The American Medical Association opposes the patenting of human genes and related naturally occurring mutations.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5275</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5273</link>
    <title>Human Genome Project leader warns against attempts to patent genes</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;John Sulston, who led the UK branch of the Human Genome Project, says patents on human genes would restrict access to treatments and inhibit research.
&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5273</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5270</link>
    <title>The case for and against the patenting of genes</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;In 1998, Penn geneticists Arupa Ganguly and Haig Kazazian were ordered to stop offering women a test for genetic mutations that carry a dire risk of breast cancer.


 &lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5270</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5265</link>
    <title>Cancer gene patent faces legal challenge </title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Landmark legal action was launched against the owners of the patent over the genes associated with an increased risk of cancer.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5265</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5200</link>
    <title>Stem cells, human genes, and patents</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;A recent ruling on a stem cell patent is similar with concurrent challenges to patents on human genes related to breast cancer.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5200</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5197</link>
    <title>PTO Finds Stem Cell Patent Anticipated, Obvious in Light of 'Significant Guideposts'</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The Patent and Trademark Office appeals board found that a patent on human embryonic stem cells was invalid as obvious at the time of invention.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5197</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5179</link>
    <title>Upholding of WARF stem cell patent reversed</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The US Patent and Trademark Office agreed with public interest critics and will likely end a major human stem cell patent.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5179</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5165</link>
    <title>Mixed Messages on Gene Patenting</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;The recent landmark US court ruling against gene patents has reignited debate on the issue in Australia just weeks before the expected release of a senate report.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5165</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5148</link>
    <title>How Gene Patents Harm Innovation</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Far from hurting biotech innovation, eliminating pure gene patents will greatly speed innovation in the biotech sector.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5148</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5143</link>
    <title>Genes belong to humanity</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Claiming exclusive domain over human genes is a troubling precedent. Genes come from our bodies and thus should belong to all of us&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5143</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5138</link>
    <title>Gene Patents on CBS's &quot;60 Minutes&quot;</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;This Sunday, the long-running American television news show will air a segment on the debate over human gene patents.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5138</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5137</link>
    <title>Gene-patenting issue not settled despite ruling</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;A judge threw out patents on genes linked to breast and ovarian cancer, siding with scientists and health advocates who argue that a company cannot patent a product of nature.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5137</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5204</link>
    <title>Court Rules Isolated and Purified Breast Cancer Genes Unpatentable Under §101</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;Isolated and purified DNA lacking “markedly different characteristics” from native DNA is not patentable, a US court ruled.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5204</guid>
  </item>

  <item>
    <link>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5136</link>
    <title>It Ain't 'Brave New World' Yet: Federal Court Strikes Down Human Gene Patents</title>
    <description>&lt;div class=&quot;text blurb&quot;&gt;&amp;#8203;The Center for Genetics and Society is trumpeting a ruling from a New York-based federal court that squashed a biotech company's efforts to patent human genes.&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010</pubDate>
    <guid>http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=5136</guid>
  </item>

</channel></rss>
