A Montana couple who say they would have terminated a pregnancy if
they had known their daughter would be born with cystic fibrosis can
move forward with their lawsuit against their health care providers, a
state judge has ruled.
District Judge Mike Salvagni
ruled Monday that Kerrie and Joe Evans’ claims should be heard in court,
the Bozeman Daily Chronicle reported (http://bit.ly/MH9eL1) Thursday.
lawsuit, filed in October, names several health care providers,
including Livingston HealthCare and nurse Peggy Scanson. It seeks
damages for emotional distress and their daughter’s medical costs and a
requirement that the clinic establish a checklist to ensure patients are
informed of all genetic testing available and given the opportunity to
accept or decline it in writing.
lawsuit claimed that Kerrie Evans, who was 38 when she became pregnant,
told Scanson that the pregnancy was unplanned and she and her husband
had “the most private of discussions about terminating the pregnancy in
the event the fetus tested positive for serious fetal abnormalities.”
Gardiner couple said Scanson failed to exercise a standard of care by
failing to have them accept or reject blood tests to determine if they
carried the recessive gene that would have given their unborn child a 25
percent chance of being born with cystic fibrosis, a disease that
causes mucus to build up in the lungs.
The couple also
alleged that Scanson failed to order a test for the disease as part of
risky genetic testing Kerrie Evans underwent during the first trimester
of her pregnancy, even though she had expressed her concerns about the
disease to Scanson.
The clinic and Scanson asked Salvagni
to dismiss the case, calling it a “wrongful birth” lawsuit for which
there was no precedent in Montana law. They argued legislators were
better suited to deal with the complex, moral issue.
Evanses are seeking damages “for a missed opportunity to abort their
daughter,” wrote Julie Lichte, attorney for Scanson and Livingston
HealthCare. Allowing the case to proceed “will ask a jury to award them
damages for the very existence of their daughter,” the attorney said.
Salvagni rejected the argument and its use of the “wrongful birth”
label, which the judge noted in bold and underlined capital letters.
‘wrongful birth’ label is not instructive as any ‘wrongfulness’ lies
not in the birth but in the negligence of the physician,” he wrote.
Lichte also contended her clients’ actions did not cause damage to the Evanses.
fibrosis is an incurable, genetic disease that is inherited at the time
of conception,” she argued. “Neither (Livingston HealthCare) nor
Scanson caused Baby Evans to contract cystic fibrosis and neither could
have prevented this disease.”
The couple’s attorneys,
Casey Magan and Russ Waddell, said the case is similar to a misdiagnosed
cancer patient receiving damages for their decreased opportunity to
fight the disease as well as their increased pain and suffering. Both
cases amount to negligence, they argued, and the judge agreed. The
case is about “Kerrie’s lost right to make an informed, intelligent
decision about whether or not to terminate her pregnancy,” Salvagni
wrote. Ruling otherwise would “immunize from liability those in the
medical field providing guidance to persons who would choose to exercise
their constitutional right to abort their fetuses, which, if born,
would suffer from genetic (or other) defects.”
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
biotechnology and public policy issues. We believe this constitutes a
'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.