AT LEAST 15 children born through surrogacy to Irish couples abroad are caught in a legal limbo which has left them either stateless or unable to get an Irish passport.
This is despite the recommendations of the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction – established more than a decade ago – which urged the Government to regulate surrogacy.
Meanwhile, many parents say delays in resolving their children’s legal status is a source of ongoing stress and is likely to involve expensive legal action. One Dublin couple in their 30s, who have been stranded abroad in India for several weeks, say they are “tearing their hair out” waiting to have their child’s status regularised. “We are tired and angry with the Irish authorities,” said one of the parents, who declined to be named.
A 43-year-old man who had a child by a surrogate mother in India last year ended up using his British citizenship to bring his son into the country via Northern Ireland. “My child was stuck in India for five months in the end. I feel I was treated terribly,” he said.
Officials at the Passport Office and Department of Foreign Affairs, however, say they are obliged to work within the confines of the law which is in place to protect children.
“The passport is not a magic bullet – parents need to establish citizenship and guardianship for the welfare of the child. When that is established, that’s where we come in and issue a passport,” a senior official said. He stressed that the law was in place to prevent abduction and to protect the welfare of children.
Meanwhile, solicitors for a Dublin couple, Mike Coffey and Catherine Maye, have written to the Minister for Foreign Affairs demanding answers as to why their one-year-old daughter, Robyn, cannot have her status regularised. She was born via a surrogate mother in India but is now legally stateless. They say they face a prohibitively expensive High Court case to secure citizenship and guardianship for Robyn.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available in our efforts to advance understanding of
biotechnology and public policy issues. We believe this constitutes a
'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section
107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.