Americans strongly
disapprove of pet cloning, and very consistently oppose animal cloning in general, even to reestablished endangered, or revive extinct, species.
Pet Cloning Poll Summary
|
Poll
|
Date
|
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
Other
|
| ORC |
Feb 2004 |
13
|
80
|
7
|
Gallup
|
May 2002
|
15
|
82
|
3
|
| Fox |
Feb 2002 |
12
|
84
|
4
|
| Fox |
Apr 2001 |
16
|
79
|
5
|
The Opinion
Research Corporation (ORC) poll summary was prepared
for the American Anti-Vivisection Society, and contains fairly
detailed demographic breakdowns. It is the only available poll
that specifically addresses the issue of genetically modified
(as distinguished from cloned) pets, and shows that this is
even more unpopular, with 84% opposing it and only 12% approving
it.
The 2001 and 2002 Fox polls asked about cloning "a pet dog or cat."
The same polls, and 1997 and 1998 Fox polls, also asked about cloning endangered species, and to reintroduce extinct species, as well as
livestock, with somewhat less dramatic (but overall similar
and consistent) results.
Endangered Species, Extinct Species and Livestock Poll Summary
|
Cloning...
|
Date
|
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
Other
|
| Endangered species |
Feb 2002 |
29
|
64
|
7
|
| Endangered species |
Apr 2001 |
32
|
61
|
7
|
Endangered species
|
Jan 1998
|
32
|
61
|
7
|
Endangered species
|
Mar 1997
|
31
|
60
|
9
|
Extinct species
|
Feb 2002
|
20
|
72
|
8
|
Extinct species
|
Apr 2001
|
23
|
69
|
8
|
Extinct species
|
Jan 1998
|
19
|
73
|
8
|
Extinct species
|
Mar 1997
|
19
|
70
|
11
|
| Livestock |
Feb 2002 |
23
|
71
|
6
|
| Livestock |
Apr 2001 |
27
|
66
|
7
|
Livestock
|
Jan 1998
|
28
|
65
|
7
|
Livestock
|
Mar 1997
|
28
|
62
|
6
|
The 2002 Gallup poll also asked about endangered species, with similar results: 38% approving, 58% disapproving and 4% with no opinion.
Animal cloning in general is unpopular, as the following summary
shows. The 2002–10 Gallup polls, and a 1997 CNN/Time poll, asked
whether animal cloning was "morally acceptable" or
"morally wrong." The 2001 Gallup poll asked whether
it "should or should not be allowed." ABC asked
if it should be "legal" or "illegal." The
2001 Time/CNN poll asked if it was "a good idea or a bad
idea." The 2002 GPPC (Genetics and Public Policy Center) poll asked for approval/disapproval of "scientists working on ways to
clone animals."
Animal Cloning Poll Summary
|
Poll
|
Date
|
Approve
|
Disapprove
|
Other
|
Gallup
|
May 2011
|
32
|
62
|
6
|
Gallup
|
May 2010
|
31
|
63
|
6
|
Gallup
|
May 2009
|
34
|
63
|
3
|
Gallup
|
May 2008
|
33
|
61
|
6
|
Gallup
|
May 2007
|
36
|
59
|
5
|
Gallup
|
May 2006
|
29
|
65
|
6
|
Gallup
|
May 2005
|
35
|
61
|
4
|
Gallup (Canada)
|
2004
|
30
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Gallup (UK)
|
2004
|
26
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
| Gallup |
May 2004 |
32
|
64
|
4
|
Gallup (teens)
|
Aug 2003
|
32
|
67
|
1
|
| Gallup |
May 2003 |
29
|
68
|
3
|
GPPC
|
Oct 2002
|
37
|
55
|
8
|
| Gallup |
May 2002 |
29
|
66
|
5
|
| ABC |
Aug 2001 |
37
|
59
|
4
|
| Gallup |
May 2001 |
32
|
64
|
4
|
| Time/CNN |
Feb 2001 |
29
|
67
|
4
|
| CNN/Time |
Feb 1997 |
28
|
66
|
6
|
In April/May 1999, a Pew survey asked whether the cloning of a sheep had been a change for the better (15%), a change for the worse (49%), or had not made much difference (23%); 13% did not know or refused to answer.
There are, however, some demographic groups that tend to support
animal cloning for research purposes, though not as pets. According
to the 2001 Gallup and ABC polls, these include those with postgraduate
education and those earning above $75,000. Religious people
tended to be more opposed than the non-religious. There was
also a substantial gender gap, with women strongly opposed to
animal cloning (71-25 % in the ABC poll, 74% opposed in the
Gallup), and men almost evenly split.
The ORC data on cloning companion animals also shows a gender
difference, but notably smaller: 86% of women oppose pet cloning,
as do 74% of men. On allowing companies to genetically engineer
pets, opposition is even higher — 89% of women and 78% of men
oppose this, as do over 80% of people in every age bracket and
with every level of educational attainment. |