Home Overview Press Room Blog Publications For Students about us
Search

Animal and Pet Cloning Opinion Polls

June 1st, 2011

Americans strongly disapprove of pet cloning, and very consistently oppose animal cloning in general, even to reestablished endangered, or revive extinct, species.

Pet Cloning Poll Summary

Poll
Date
Approve
Disapprove
Other
ORC Feb 2004
13
80
7
Gallup
May 2002
15
82
3
Fox Feb 2002
12
84
4
Fox Apr 2001
16
79
5

The Opinion Research Corporation (ORC) poll summary was prepared for the American Anti-Vivisection Society, and contains fairly detailed demographic breakdowns. It is the only available poll that specifically addresses the issue of genetically modified (as distinguished from cloned) pets, and shows that this is even more unpopular, with 84% opposing it and only 12% approving it.

The 2001 and 2002 Fox polls asked about cloning "a pet dog or cat." The same polls, and 1997 and 1998 Fox polls, also asked about cloning endangered species, and to reintroduce extinct species, as well as livestock, with somewhat less dramatic (but overall similar and consistent) results.

Endangered Species, Extinct Species and Livestock Poll Summary

Cloning...
Date
Approve
Disapprove
Other
Endangered species Feb 2002
29
64
7
Endangered species Apr 2001
32
61
7
Endangered species
Jan 1998
32
61
7
Endangered species
Mar 1997
31
60
9
Extinct species
Feb 2002
20
72
8
Extinct species
Apr 2001
23
69
8
Extinct species
Jan 1998
19
73
8
Extinct species
Mar 1997
19
70
11
Livestock Feb 2002
23
71
6
Livestock Apr 2001
27
66
7
Livestock
Jan 1998
28
65
7
Livestock
Mar 1997
28
62
6

The 2002 Gallup poll also asked about endangered species, with similar results: 38% approving, 58% disapproving and 4% with no opinion.

Animal cloning in general is unpopular, as the following summary shows. The 2002–10 Gallup polls, and a 1997 CNN/Time poll, asked whether animal cloning was "morally acceptable" or "morally wrong." The 2001 Gallup poll asked whether it "should or should not be allowed." ABC asked if it should be "legal" or "illegal." The 2001 Time/CNN poll asked if it was "a good idea or a bad idea." The 2002 GPPC (Genetics and Public Policy Center) poll asked for approval/disapproval of "scientists working on ways to clone animals."

Animal Cloning Poll Summary

Poll
Date
Approve
Disapprove
Other
Gallup
May 2011
32
62
6
Gallup
May 2010
31
63
6
Gallup
May 2009
34
63
3
Gallup
May 2008
33
61
6
Gallup
May 2007
36
59
5
Gallup
May 2006
29
65
6
Gallup
May 2005
35
61
4
Gallup (Canada)
2004
30
n/a
n/a
Gallup (UK)
2004
26
n/a
n/a
Gallup May 2004
32
64
4
Gallup (teens)
Aug 2003
32
67
1
Gallup May 2003
29
68
3
GPPC
Oct 2002
37
55
8
Gallup May 2002
29
66
5
ABC Aug 2001
37
59
4
Gallup May 2001
32
64
4
Time/CNN Feb 2001
29
67
4
CNN/Time Feb 1997
28
66
6

In April/May 1999, a Pew survey asked whether the cloning of a sheep had been a change for the better (15%), a change for the worse (49%), or had not made much difference (23%); 13% did not know or refused to answer.

There are, however, some demographic groups that tend to support animal cloning for research purposes, though not as pets. According to the 2001 Gallup and ABC polls, these include those with postgraduate education and those earning above $75,000. Religious people tended to be more opposed than the non-religious. There was also a substantial gender gap, with women strongly opposed to animal cloning (71-25 % in the ABC poll, 74% opposed in the Gallup), and men almost evenly split.

The ORC data on cloning companion animals also shows a gender difference, but notably smaller: 86% of women oppose pet cloning, as do 74% of men. On allowing companies to genetically engineer pets, opposition is even higher — 89% of women and 78% of men oppose this, as do over 80% of people in every age bracket and with every level of educational attainment.


ESPAÑOL | PORTUGUÊS | Русский

home | overview | blog | publications| about us | donate | newsletter | press room | privacy policy

CGS • 1936 University Ave, Suite 350, Berkeley, CA 94704 • • (p) 1.510.665.7760 • (F) 1.510.665.8760