1. UNESCO report opposes “designer
baby” technology
The United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO) will be considering two important policy statements
relevant to human genetic modification in Montreal, Canada on
Nov. 26-28. One statement opposes the use of pre-implantation
genetic diagnosis for non-medical purposes such as selection
for sex or cosmetic traits. It also affirms UNESCO’s earlier
opposition to inheritable genetic modification. The second statement
establishes a process for developing a “Universal Instrument
on Bioethics.” The proposed bioethics instrument would
address such topics as access to health care, assisted reproduction,
end-of-life issues, intellectual property, human subjects research,
human organ/tissue transplantation, and the use of embryonic
stem cells for research.
In recent years policy on these matters has often been influenced
by professional bioethicists who espouse utilitarian rather
than social justice values. UNESCO has historically emphasized
social justice values, and has been a progressive political
force in international affairs. If it remains true to its political
roots, it is in a position to play an important role on the
world stage concerning the new human genetic technologies.
For copies of the UNESCO reports see http://www.unesco.org/ibc
For background and other links on UNESCO and the new human
genetic technologies, see http://www.genetics-and-society.org/policies/international/unesco.html
2. International Olympics Committee bans
human genetic modification
The International Olympics Committee (IOC) and the World Anti-Doping
Agency (WADA) have decided to add human genetic modification
to their list of banned practices. Effective January 1, 2003,
“Gene or cell doping is defined as the non-therapeutic
use of genes, genetic elements, and/or cells that have the capacity
to enhance athletic performance.” In the past, WADA has
been forced to react as new drugs have been developed and used.
The new ruling preemptively bans an anticipated category of
unacceptable technologies. WADA president Dick Pound said, “By
introducing the notion of genetic doping into the list at this
time, we are taking into account the important changes occurring
in doping techniques.”
See Adrian Warner, “IOC Bans Human Genetic Engineering
From Sports,” Reuters (October 1, 2002) http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/sports/4188493.htm
|